Chokes won’t hurt you, so you can go as far as you want, a little nap here and there won’t hurt anyone, not taping to joint locks in training is silly
JiuJitsu.com || How To Finish a Straight Ankle Lock || Roli DelgadoPanza's footlock is very foreign to me. I've never met anyone who had a bite almost on the calf like he does.
The best footlock guy I know does them almost like a high elbow guillotine - it hurts before before the breaking pressure even sets in.
Personally I prefer the classic gracie style footlock where figure 4 the foot - helps me counter the boot defense more.
I've heard repeatedly about using a twisting motion on the foot that can potentially damage the knee if not severely injure the ankle. Anyone have any videos that emphasize this?
JiuJitsu.com || How To Finish a Straight Ankle Lock || Roli Delgado
There ya go.
The twisting motion of the modern ankle lock doesn't typically hurt the knee, unless the defender does something dumb. But it does ensure that the ankle lock will tear things like the ATF ligament and dislocate the foot rather than just crushing the achilles as in the older achilles locks, which is typically the downfall of the figure-4/old Gracie-style method.
With the right torque, you can break bones. DDS, Cummings and modern foot locks/heel hooks focus on the break. You can have no ligaments, but you still have bones that will reach a breaking point.
JiuJitsu.com || How To Finish a Straight Ankle Lock || Roli Delgado
There ya go.
The twisting motion of the modern ankle lock doesn't typically hurt the knee, unless the defender does something dumb. But it does ensure that the ankle lock will tear things like the ATF ligament and dislocate the foot rather than just crushing the achilles as in the older achilles locks, which is typically the downfall of the figure-4/old Gracie-style method.
Fair enough. I’m really replying to guys who say they have no ligaments or have super flexible ligaments. That is why they say they don’t tap.To correct you anatomically, without ligaments there is no joint at all.
Just some adjacent unconnected bones. Without ligaments in your ankle you aren't walking ever.
Fair enough. I’m really replying to guys who say they have no ligaments or have super flexible ligaments. That is why they say they don’t tap.
I think some of them where valid with some of the super old school legs locks. I remember being taught pressure point straight footlocks targeting the point the tendon connects to the muscle or whatever bullshit place. Actually felt it was the hardest and most resistant place on my leg[/QUOTE]Yeah I've heard the excuses, I just think they're all retarded.
[/QUOTE]I think some of them where valid with some of the super old school legs locks. I remember being taught pressure point straight footlocks targeting the point the tendon connects to the muscle or whatever bullshit place. Actually felt it was the hardest and most resistant place on my leg
Who the hell taught you that?
1) evaluate if the grip is breakable without wasting a ton of energy. There are technical ways to break most lapel grips that aren’t the cross grip to the ankle lock side, which is rarely worth breaking and you should attempt to prevent with your other hand. If it is not worth breaking, transition to a pass or a different leglock.I have continued to develop my footlocks since creating this thread. I've also added the caio terra footlock. It is actually extremely powerful and many people do not expect it - I can see why Craig and Caio have success with it.
1. How do you guys deal with people grabbing the lapel to prevent you from arching back for the footlock?
2. I crunched another guy's foot last week who refused to respect the footlock. I let go as soon as I heard the crunch.
Do you guys continue to crank if the guy refuses to tap?