I respect and enjoy watching both GSP and Lawler a lot. But It seems to me this is a bad match up for GSP. Lawlers take down defense has gotten amazing and we all know that GSP doesn't have the best chin.
I think Lawler stands a good chance against current GSP. I mean GSP got destroyed by an ever improving Hendricks
I want a polygraph test cause I don't believe that he even believes that
"Robbie is a much more refined striker than Georges is. He hits much harder and Georges certainly would not be able to hold Rob down and ride out a decision."
Could we possibly get a poll?
What do you guys think? I think Robbie Gets taken down at will, but would have the striking advantage over GSP if GSP didn't establish his jab right away. Would be an awesome matchup if GSP came back.
Source:
http://www.foxsports.com/ufc/story/...k-st-pierre-012015?cmpid=tsmtw:fscom:ufconfox
What do you guys think? I think Robbie Gets taken down at will, but would have the striking advantage over GSP if GSP didn't establish his jab right away.
lol. GSP got owned. Youre a bad judge1st. GSP didn't get destroyed. Actually he won the fight.
2nd. That was by far the best hendricks version we've ever seen. He was in way better shape. than both his fights against Lawler (dodging random testing was probably the reason).
If Robbie had a striking advantage then GSP would just one of his many tools to nullify it. GSP is an expert in countering advantages.
I've been saying what Pat Miletich has said for a long time. Lawler smashes George...
People also have said that, "Oh he won't beat Kosh. He won't beat Rory. He won't beat Johny. He won't beat blah blah blah..."