bubkusjones
Brown Belt
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 4,982
- Reaction score
- 0
"Lifetime" bans from Dana usually last a year, at most. Look at Marquardt.
We aren't in the dark ages anymore
You are right, a fighter doesnt have to let go of a sub until the ref tells him to stop, the problem you seem to leave it is the reason he was cut is because he DIDNT LET GO WHEN THE REF TOLD HIM TO STOP.
not once, not twice, not three or even 4 times. he has done this in mma/bjj about 5 times.
http://www.mixedmartialarts.com/mma.cfm?go=forum.posts&thread=2236857&forum=1&page=1&pc=31
What did you watch? The mistake they made as an org was not putting a guy like Yamasaki in there. Because Palhares speaks portugese and he probably didn't understand what that ref was saying. He let go as soon as the ref came to him
I honestly i don't care if Palhares did it on purpose. A fighter should never let go of submission until the Referee pull him off the opponent.in 2002, Matt Lindland taped out, leading McCarthy to intercede. But when he shouted to stop the fight, Lindland argued he didn't tap, and McCarthy opted to restart the fight.
This bout remains the biggest gaffe on McCarthy.
Ken Shamrock did a hell of a lot more to leon dijk then Palhares did to Mike Pierce
Shamrock was not criticized at the time to torqued Mr Dijk ankle 180 degrees and until the Referee pull him off . we loved him for it. We all-so like Frank Mir for Breaking Tim Sylvia Arm. Anyway 3 or 4 wins at WW and Palhares will be back in the ufc.
Well, in Ken's defense, he did let go long before the ref called it off. :icon_chee
But, yeah that was pretty nasty.
You are right, a fighter doesnt have to let go of a sub until the ref tells him to stop, the problem you seem to leave it is the reason he was cut is because he DIDNT LET GO WHEN THE REF TOLD HIM TO STOP.
not once, not twice, not three or even 4 times. he has done this in mma/bjj about 5 times.
http://www.mixedmartialarts.com/mma.cfm?go=forum.posts&thread=2236857&forum=1&page=1&pc=31
In his very NEXT FIGHT just 5 months later Palhares did it again with a heel-hook finish of Flavio Luiz Moura.
Another uninformed poster. You clearly are missing the point.
Palhares is a multiple time repete offender.
In 2007 in Brazil Palhares choked Heilo Dipp unconscious with a rear-naked choke, he then had to be pulled off by the ref.
In his very NEXT FIGHT just 5 months later Palhares did it again with a heel-hook finish of Flavio Luiz Moura.
Now fast foward to the UFC and now this is the second time he has pulled this s*** in the UFC.
He's a repete offender and has no business fighting in the best organization in the world he's a liabiliaty to not only the UFC but to the health and well being of the fighters he fights.
Some of those heal hooks and leg locks are the most dangerous and potential career ending submissions you can pull off if you continue to keep holding that for too long the heel hook just dosent mess up your ankle and foot up it destroys and rips apart tendons in your knee also.
There is no use for a guy like Palhares to be fighting in the best organization with his past repeat offences. He litterally can end someone's career and will never fight in the UFC EVER AGAIN! Like I said he's is finished in the UFC and will never fight in the UFC ever again.
This, Ken did let go pretty much straight away.
Just watched it. You are 100% right. The people are are fucking tools.the ref in this fight was warning flavio for the illegal kick to the head meanwhile rousimar is going for a heel hook and the ref isnt even paying attention
so blame the ref on that one....none of you guys even watch the fights you speak about and just go off hear say
Just watched it. You are 100% right. The people are are fucking tools.
Isn't the ref in that fight Vitor Ribeiro? I wouldn't call him dumb and reckless...i dont like to see anyone injured but some of these refs are sooo dumb and reckless.
sucks this happens