- Joined
- Mar 29, 2016
- Messages
- 6,086
- Reaction score
- 2,656
Thanks, but I'll stick with Pornhub.
prefer the big-muscle guy types do we? that's cute.
Please explain how selling sex is a "[lower] standard of ethics."You don't respect a woman with a higher standard of ethics than you, who doesn't believe in selling her sexuality? I'm sure they will be crushed to know this.
lolWhy wouldn't any beautiful woman sell sex? Dudes are so thirsty that a woman can just be sexually suggested online, and the guys will pay for it. LOL
Please explain how selling sex is a "[lower] standard of ethics."
I have no problems with a woman "who doesn't believe in selling her sexuality." My statement was I don't respect broke women, especially those who are average and above looking.
You created a strawman and now you are throwing stones at it. LOL
What a fucking simp.Why wouldn't any beautiful woman sell sex? Dudes are so thirsty that a woman can just be sexually suggested online, and the guys will pay for it. LOL
I don't respect broke women. Especially if they are average and above looking. No excuse for a woman to be broke these days. LOL
Just because you claim something, it doesn't mean that your claim is truthful. You need to explain why you believe I am a simp. It is not enough to just claim it. LOLWhat a fucking simp.
I asked you to explain why selling sex is a "[lower] standard" and you didn't.If they don't believe in selling their sexuality then their looks should have no impact on how broke they are.
To respect broke women less if they are above average looking suggests that they should be profiting off of their looks and you don't respect their view otherwise. Plain and simple.
As for selling sex being a lower standard of ethics, there are two simple arguments:
1. Ethics, being subjective, are therefore accepted based on social norms. Virtually every society in history has ostracized and/ or criminalized prostitution and many have done so with other forms of sexualization.
2. Regardless of "right" and "wrong", which are subjective, standards can be higher or lower based on strictness. Whether you think that selling sexuality is wrong or not, believing it is, is clearly a higher standard of strictness in one's ethical code. Even if I believe something is ok, I would never disrespect someone for holding themselves to a higher standard than me, even if I think it's unnecessary.
Just because you claim something, it doesn't mean that your claim is truthful. You need to explain why you believe I am a simp. It is not enough to just claim it. LOL
I asked you to explain why selling sex is a "[lower] standard" and you didn't.
(1) Society is not always the best judge of acceptable behavior. Society has legalized a lot of relatively despicable behaviors such as enslavement of other human beings, while criminalizing relatively benign behaviors such as homosexual sex. Therefore, your "because society says so" argument is a very weak one.
(2) The question is how do you know that someone's standard is higher than yours? What exactly are the variables that you are measuring/weighing to decide that one standard is higher than the other?
You didn't make an argument for why sex work is a lower standard.
https://nypost.com/2020/02/27/ufc-s...for-weird-qa-with-fans/?utm_source=reddit.com
The American, 25, left little to the imagination as she stripped off alongside fellow MMA star Austin Vanderford. VanZant was bombarded with bizarre questions from her 2.4 million followers on Instagram.
She started her Q&A alongside Vanderford on the sofa, but things got steamy when they moved to the bathroom. The happy couple continued to answer questions while they were sat in the bathtub together.
She splashed around in the bubbles as she struggled not to reveal too much.
Her voice is so annoying... bitch STFU
I'll supply a pic guys