http://news.yahoo.com/mcdonalds-murder-china-sparks-outrage-080318002--finance.html This is indeed a strange case. Apparently there is this violent religious cult. Are they an extreme shaolin cult or something. Where is Kwai Chang Kane?
You people that have such a strong hate for religion have extreme double standards. So if someone in America commits murder, you don't bat an eye and just accept the fact that the person is bad and should pay for their crime. Obviously this would be an un-American like act considering it's against American law to kill. You don't say, "those crazy Americans". Because obviously it would be dumb to state that all Americans were murderers and it's also obvious that this person didn't follow the law therefore they're a bad person and bad example for the average American. But if someone who claims to be a Christian, if they commit murder, which would be an un-Christian like act considering it's against Christian law to kill, the first thing you say is "those crazy Christians". Acting as if this person was a true Christian even though their actions were against the law of Christianity. Additionally, you consider the entire Christian religion as guilty as the murderer. Please explain how this works..... .
Wow agree with 556 here. These guys were scumbags, and did an awful thing that had nothing to do with Christianity.
Yeah, but if they were Muslims, every Christian in America would be saying what violent savages Muslims are. And how their religion is evil.
No one is talking about christianity here but 556. They are talking about religous cultists, and the story is also about passive onlookers in the public place who didn't aid the victim.
If it was a small muslim cult that often commited violent acts it wouldn't be too far off. And the same goes with a small extremist christrian group. They are bad, they are also religous. Some people feel there is a strong correlation between the two and place blame on the religous aspect, even though the most important variable here is the individual(s) who would most likely be violent or engineer violence regardless of their specific religous affiliations.
Well, for the poster you quoted, he's one of those brain dead liberals who bashes religion yet still defends Islam at every opportunity.
