Law Our Respect for Marriage Act: Signed into law 12/13/22

Do you support gay marriage being federally codified?


  • Total voters
    47
  • Poll closed .

Lead

/Led/ blanket
Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
45,544
Reaction score
12,406
Final Post 12/13/22
Final update here. Bill is signed. Not a big surprise or any further development.

Biden signs Respect for Marriage Act, reflecting his and the country's evolution
NPR
President Biden signed into law Tuesday a bipartisan bill that codifies same-sex and interracial marriages with a large celebration on the South Lawn of the White House.

The president spoke before a crowd of thousands gathered to celebrate the federal protections in the Respect for Marriage Act.

"The road to this moment has been long, but those who believe in equality and justice – you never gave up," Biden said.

Updated Post 12/8/22

House voted on this first but they needed to vote again to affirm the religious protections pieces the senate added to get enough support for 60+ votes. This is all but finished at this point so we will now have a codified floor on states recognizing gay marriage and also interracial marriage protections as well though that wasn’t seen as something that really would be overturned by the courts unless you really believe Clarence Thomas would rule against protections for his own marriage.

I know there are people who aren’t fans of the filibuster but consider now that gay marriage would now need over 60 votes to be invalidated assuming there wasn’t a SCOTUS ruling that protected it. If you really think Democrats would never pull back on that right, then its nearly impossible you will see something like that ever pass as it’s very hard for a party to get 60 votes in this era and also have both the house and White House. The filibuster ensures when social change happens, there’s a reasonable amount of agreement and then makes it pretty hard to reverse. Say we trashed the filibuster. You have a far more likely chance of those rights being reversed if you really have little faith in republicans.

Respect for Marriage Act overcomes GOP opposition, passes House
MSNBC
By most measures, the Respect for Marriage Act wouldn’t have been written were it not for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. The far-right jurist issued a concurring opinion six months ago, arguing that a 2015 ruling on marriage equality was “demonstrably erroneous” and should be “reconsidered.”

It came against a backdrop of Republican officials at multiple levels of government expressing overt opposition to same-sex marriage.

Updated Post 11/29/22

Passed 61-36. A second vote will be needed in the house due to the amendments in the senate version and then to Biden’s desk

Senate passes landmark protections for same-sex marriage
The Hill
Senators on Tuesday passed legislation cementing federal protections for same-sex marriage, a historic step that follows months of bipartisan negotiations and puts the landmark bill just steps away from becoming law.

The Senate passed the Respect for Marriage Act in a 61-36 vote, with 12 Republicans joining forces with all Democrats present to advance the bill across the Capitol complex. The measure required 60 votes to pass.


Updated Post 11/29/22

Another procedural vote went through yesterday. Today (Tuesday) around noon, we should be seeing amendment votes for the bill from Mike Lee (UT), Marco Rubio (FL) and James Lankford (OK). I don’t know all the amendments from these three but Lee’s seems to be about more religious protections. Quite a few changes got made for this before the bill made it to the floor and it was enough to get some religious groups in favor of the bill, including the church of Latter Day Saints.

One other item here I don’t think I covered is this bill will serve as a floor/ net compared to the SCOTUS ruling which is the ceiling on gay marriage rights. The SCOTUS ruling made each state have to allow gay marriage. This current bill will make each state have to recognize another states marriages. So essentially, if the SCOTUS ruling was reversed, you’d have some states that don’t host gay marriage and others that do. Couples which would get married in the states that allow it would still have their marriage recognized in states that don’t allow it. So it’s slightly less protections but would still give a path for any couple to still get married and have it recognized wherever they go in the country.

Live Feed
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/floor_activity_pail.htm


Updated Post 9/15/22

Looks like due to the small window left, the vote will not happen until at least November after midterms

Senate delays same-sex marriage vote until after midterms
Politico
A bipartisan group of senators trying to pass same-sex marriage protection legislation on Thursday pushed a vote until after the election, a move they say increases their chances of success but avoids forcing the GOP on record before the midterms.

The bill’s chief sponsor, Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), broke the news to reporters after a Democratic caucus lunch. Earlier in the day, the group of five senators leading talks on the bill recommended to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer that a vote occur after the election after several Republicans called for a delay.


Original Post 7/19/22
As part of the recent Dobbs decision, Pelosi and house democrats have decided to put two bill through, one about contraception and the other (this thread) to codify interracial and gay marriage into federal law. This is in reaction to the idea Loving v Virginia and/ or Obergefell v. Hodges cases being overturned at the SCOTUS.


House passes bill to protect same-sex marriage in effort to counter Supreme Court
CNN

The Democrat-led House of Representatives on Tuesday voted to pass a bill that would enshrine protections for same-sex marriage into federal law.

The bipartisan final vote was 267 to 157 with 47 Republicans joining with Democrats to vote for the bill. It's not clear, however, whether the bill can pass the Senate where at least 10 Republicans would need to join with Democrats to overcome the filibuster's 60-vote threshold.

The vote comes amid fears among Democrats that the conservative majority on the Supreme Court could take aim at same-sex marriage in the future, after the high court overturned Roe v. Wade in a highly consequential reversal of longstanding legal precedent.

Unsure if this goes anywhere in the senate but if it did and passed, this could signal that we truly are seeing Congress become more active in reaction to the courts decisions with their own follow up legislation. This isn’t to say the bill passing would be equivalent to the current law of the land with the past rulings which ruled these as rights whereas a federal law could just being overturned in the future. Look like Feinstein put out a senate version just today.

Congress bill overview
 
Last edited:
As part of the recent Dobbs decision, Pelosi and house democrats have decided to put two bill through, one about contraception and the other (this thread) to codify interracial and gay marriage into federal law. This is in reaction to the idea Loving v Virginia and/ or Obergefell v. Hodges cases being overturned at the SCOTUS.


House passes bill to protect same-sex marriage in effort to counter Supreme Court
CNN



Unsure if this goes anywhere in the senate but if it did and passed, this could signal that we truly are seeing Congress become more active in reaction to the courts decisions with their own follow up legislation. This isn’t to say the bill passing would be equivalent to the current law of the land with the past rulings which ruled these as rights whereas a federal law could just being overturned in the future. Look like Feinstein put out a senate version just today.

Congress bill overview
Instated of doing something actual of trying to find ways to help the economy this is the democrats biggest focus.
 
lmao a little late for that don’t you think? Goddamn the Dems are worthless fucking trash. As if this won’t instantly get swept aside in a few years if it even passes at all. Congrats on pretending to do something I guess.
 
Manchin is an enigma so my expectation is very low. Also even if its passes the senate through sheer miracle, isn't all this does is a federal recognition of sort? though this is probably the absolute limit of what the congress can do.
 
Manchin is an enigma so my expectation is very low. Also even if its passes the senate through sheer miracle, isn't all this does is a federal recognition of sort? though this is probably the absolute limit of what the congress can do.
Republicans with a brain (Romney, Cheney, sometimes Collins) will vote to pass
 
This is like low brain power stuff that they’ll tout around like they cured cancer. Shouldn’t really be a question that interracial marriage can exist. Is that really included? If humans are humans how on earth can a skin tone change your ability to be married? The government is absolutely retarded and this shouldn’t be something these overpaid elected officials spend time on.
 
If it did pass could the Supreme Court still overturn and allow the states to do as they please?

Or does it become a real law and can only be overturned by congress?
 
No unrelated stuff shoved in there? Hopefully it’s not so rotten of a place to not pass the senate.

And if this gets Congress to actually pass laws that deal with more than just funding, instead of relying on courts, that would be a good thing
 
Back
Top