- Joined
- May 7, 2016
- Messages
- 42,438
- Reaction score
- 20,355
Is there a moral imperative to not make economic choices that negatively affect other people?
TS believes so
Is there a moral imperative to not make economic choices that negatively affect other people?
Gotta love how it's "jacking up the cost of living" and not increasing property values. Yeah, fuck them for not committing crime to keep property values low. Regular people deal drugs and shoot each other to keep rent low, cause ya know, regular people are more concerned with cheap rent in crime infested areas than safe neighborhoods where businesses can operate.
Because California is full. You could move to somewhere that is not California and you would be fine. There is a ton of affordable housing in this country. You do not need someone else to pay for part of your housing. I am sure the weather in California is lovely and you feel entitled to live there, but you could always just live somewhere else.Obviously you don't live in Cali. We are in need of cheaper housing.
Because California is full.
Parts of California are extremely full. Hence the rediculous traffic. I'm sure not every square inch of the entire state is full.All it took was one sentence to expose you know nothing about Cali.
Because California is full. You could move to somewhere that is not California and you would be fine. There is a ton of affordable housing in this country. You do not need someone else to pay for part of your housing. I am sure the weather in California is lovely and you feel entitled to live there, but you could always just live somewhere else.
Parts of California are extremely full. Hence the rediculous traffic. I'm sure not every square inch of the entire state is full.
That's not the point I was making though. The point I was making was that housing prices in California are nothing to bitch about. There is an abundance of affordable housing in this country. Move to one of the many affordable areas of this country if you can't afford where you live. Don't bitch or expect someone else to pay for your housing.
It's a response to gentrification. Affluent white people moving to urban areas and jacking up the cost of living to where regular people can't afford it.
Obviously you don't live in Cali. We are in need of cheaper housing.
I agree and come from the DC area. Housing is unreasonable in many areas. That said section 8 isn't a viable answer as it just spreads ghetto like cancer. There has to be a different wayThis right here. In the shittiest parts of the bronx, studio apartments are renting for $1600 a month.
Even with the new $15 minimum wage, after taxes, workers cant afford that. A studio apartment in buildings in the worst part of town are unaffordable to full time workers.
This should never be the case.
However, I can understand how some people dont understand this.
I lived in western PA for a year and a half. Mortgages for a 4 bedroom home out there were under $400 a month. Of course to them it would look completely irresponsible for workers not to save money and invest. They live in a completely different economic reality.
I remember the first time i ran a credit application out there. It was for a 21 year old couple earning under $10/hr each. They had already paid off their home. Coming from NYC, I was completely shocked. In NYC, a low wage couple would never be able to own a home. The property taxes alone would be $12,000 - $19,000 a year.
These numbers dont make sense.
https://datausa.io/profile/geo/monessen-pa?compare=bronx-county-ny
Is there a moral imperative to not make economic choices that negatively affect other people?
There was a sherdogger on here that called me racist for suggesting that government housing be located far far away from nice areas.
I think government housing should exist, but it should be very far away and limited to remote areas where no one wants to live. Like next to landfills for example. The purpose of it would be to provide the minimum social safety net while minimizing the harm these people cause to the rest of the population. This would dramatically improve cities and make them much safer and more hospital to live.
This is the core issue with the “its not fair” group. They expect to be accommodated instead of putting in the work for themselves. This country gives us opportunity, not guarantees.Because California is full. You could move to somewhere that is not California and you would be fine. There is a ton of affordable housing in this country. You do not need someone else to pay for part of your housing. I am sure the weather in California is lovely and you feel entitled to live there, but you could always just live somewhere else.
I’d love to see the statistics of old ladies and the disabled, compared to able bodied adults living in Section 8 or projects.So old ladies and people too disabled to work should have to live next to garbage dumps?
Republicans, man.
I agree and come from the DC area. Housing is unreasonable in many areas. That said section 8 isn't a viable answer as it just spreads ghetto like cancer. There has to be a different way
I’d love to see the statistics of old ladies and the disabled, compared to able bodied adults living in Section 8 or projects.
"I hate poor people. Wahhhh wahhhhh. " stfuThose who embrace it don't actually live in areas where it's implemented. We had a lengthy thread on this a few days ago and many many posters had horrifying stories of their once livable neighborhoods becoming shitholes very quickly to the point they had to move to escape it. Imagine working hard in life to provide for your family all so that one day that safety and security goes out the window through no fault of your own.