Less opinionated reporters give you less bias, but that still isn't "unbiased".It would like Fox News and MSNBC on a Saturday morning.
At those times slots, they put on young journalists who aren't cocky enough to espouse opinions and at that slot, they don't have panels of opinionated windbags.
They still only report what they report but the top 3 networks all compete for the same stories so one you remove the pundit portion, it becomes just reporting.
Glances over the headlines. Nothing about the numerous Hillary scandals. All anti-Trump headlines.
How are they trying to keep it close?
Are moderators supposed to troll? Things are pretty bad for you when you find yourself agreeing 100% with Savage
LOL. Not a word about all her contract murders or bribes, right? If that's your standard, even Fox is pro-Clinton, right?
So you think she has been involved in murders and bribes?
Not much of a reader, are you?
I thought so for a long time too. Several networks have viewers tanking and they still stick with the fuck white America narrative. They're ready to bankrupt themselves for their message.
It's not about money.
oh but it is...it must be. they arent businesses that exist anymore if it isnt about the money. you have to be wrong or the people you're talking about arent there to talk about any longer.
It is about money, but it is not all about money.
Media in China or Russia, or pretty much anywhere isn't all about money. The MSM is a propoganda conduit also which is extremely important to those in power.
the way that russian and chinese outlets make their money is different than clear channel and the like.
youre looking at the media political relationship backwards. its an issue of directionality...kinda like, "do killers simply like violent video games or did the games make them violent?" im betting that occam's razor and capitalism explain our media, including your conspiracy sites.
It's both. It's capitalism and propaganda as a balance. Money makes the world go round, but the pen is still mightier than the sword. That power is not to be overlooked (and it isn't).
The mechanism in the Western nations is more advanced, running through private platforms, as is the propaganda more advanced.
They don't need to be making money when they got billionaire sugar daddies. That's why they don't care that they're losing money and lots of it. Their business is trying to shape reality with their narratives.oh but it is...it must be. they arent businesses that exist anymore if it isnt about the money. you have to be wrong or the people you're talking about arent there to talk about any longer.
oh but it is...it must be. they arent businesses that exist anymore if it isnt about the money. you have to be wrong or the people you're talking about arent there to talk about any longer.
Oh, come on. Venezuela has about as much relevance when talking about American liberals as Pinochet's Chile has when talking about American conservatives.
Me? Funny from someone that pulled "murder and bribes" out of thin air when I said "Hillary scandals"
We should go back to ignoring each other now.
The Socialism that led to Venezuela's current state is the exact same Socialism that the Liberals in the US and Western Europe love to peddle as "The perfect system for a Utopian soicety" To think they're not the same is gross ignorance.
All media is bias. It's impossible to be completely objective.
What I look for is what exactly the motives behind the bias are and just how smart and respectable the person is that I'm reading/watching/listening to.
Glances over the headlines. Nothing about the numerous Hillary scandals. All anti-Trump headlines.
How are they trying to keep it close?
Are moderators supposed to troll? Things are pretty bad for you when you find yourself agreeing 100% with Savage