- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 25,079
- Reaction score
- 38,594
Conor has better striking. If he's the same conor and hasn't lost a step, its a competitive fight. Charles plays right into conor's hands and style. Both are fast starters. I have to see how he looks to make a definitive prediction. Even if he wins, if he scrapes by dustin, I don't think that will be enough for charles. If he wins decisively, I think he's the favorite. We'll see though.
Conor is a slick striker. Chandler isn't he was winging shit and still manage to catch charles. One thing to factor is charles reactive takedowns. He can take conor down easier than dustin did. We'll see though.
Chandler could afford to be riskier and wild in the striking exchanges because he is an elite wrestler and he was confident in his ability to grapple with Charles, even going so far as to choose to engage Charles’ guard (not a strategy I agree with) rather than force Charles to strike.
Conor WAS a very slick, creative and unpredictable striker. He has, imo, regressed into a predictable boxer with a very limited set of attacks and a stance that leaves his front leg planted and vulnerable.
Conor from 5 years ago who threw a wide variety of kicks and varied his timing and angles was a challenge for elite MMA strikers.
Conor who fought Dustin presented power shots that could be read, adjusted to and avoided. He has a dangerous left hand counter. And at 155 it isn’t a kill shot. It is dangerous but not a touch of death.
Basically Conor needs the early KO or he is getting finished. His lead leg is a liability. His ground game is a liability against Charles (anyone should be worried about Charles on the ground).
all probably a mute point as he is likely getting finished or outpointed by Poirier