One judge gave Dillashaw the fourth round?
- Thread starter Yagadot
- Start date
Round 4 was a toss up for me. I don't mind if it went either way in the judges eyes.
D'Amato giving Dillashaw Round 5 is the real head scratcher.
The other two judges agreed that 1 & 3 were Dillashaw, 2 & 5 were Sandhagen, which is how I saw it as well.
D'Amato giving Dillashaw Round 5 is the real head scratcher.
The other two judges agreed that 1 & 3 were Dillashaw, 2 & 5 were Sandhagen, which is how I saw it as well.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 1,496
- Reaction score
- 1,087
I thought Dilly won 5. I have to agree with Sals scorecard. I got it the same.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2007
- Messages
- 81,739
- Reaction score
- 133,805
Sal D'Amato should never judge again. He is consistently wrong.
D
Deleted member 545701
Guest
Outside of rounds 1-3, the rounds were basically toss ups. Especially round 4
I thought the judges were going to put a 3-2 UD for TJ but it ended up being split
I thought the judges were going to put a 3-2 UD for TJ but it ended up being split
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
- Messages
- 22,971
- Reaction score
- 21,450
It could have gone either way to be honest
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2009
- Messages
- 46,107
- Reaction score
- 102,814
Sal D’amato is the most incompetent human being alive. I wouldn’t pay that man to make a happy meal, let alone officiate a main event on an internationally televised sporting event.
Surprised by that.
It blows my mind how one guy who’s ruined this sport for over a decade is still employed.
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2004
- Messages
- 35,182
- Reaction score
- 9,559
Rounds 1 and 2 were unanimous. Rounds 3-5 were not.
Not surprised by that at all.
And I actually thought rounds 4 and 5 were closer to even than round 3.
Not surprised by that at all.
And I actually thought rounds 4 and 5 were closer to even than round 3.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2012
- Messages
- 4,580
- Reaction score
- 4,050
Dillashaw won 1,3,4 and 5. It was close but it was clear. Should have been a unanimous 49-46
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2006
- Messages
- 1,040
- Reaction score
- 571
I agree. Most ppl are too busy looking at TJs face and listening to the commentary team. I thought it was pretty clear.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2006
- Messages
- 1,040
- Reaction score
- 571
he had control and didn't get a takedown, Corey wasnt stuffing them he was holding him and damaging the legs. Blame Corey for not getting out of bad positions and not being able to capitalize on beating a guy with 1 eye, 1 leg and not fought in over 2 years.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2016
- Messages
- 11,252
- Reaction score
- 7,389
I'd bet it was one of the same judges that incorrectly had Maverick losing her fight. The corruption in MMA pops up every now and then and it's obvious when it does with multiple incorrect decisions in one night.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Messages
- 12,282
- Reaction score
- 5,101
Did Cecil Peoples die? Otherwise D'Amato is still #2.
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2019
- Messages
- 7,043
- Reaction score
- 5,666
Probably knows a lot of shady information about the buisness and can keep his job by making stupid decisions like this.
Sal D'Amato is a pretty weird fucking judge. Not only does he have a shitload of split decisions he is insanely inconsistent in his judging criteria. Here he gave TJ rounds for ineffective wrestling and stalling, but in Vettori-Adesanya he went 50-45 with Adesanya even though Vettori had at least 2 similar rounds to the ones he gave TJ using the same tactics. And these are events that are a month apart.
Either case, he makes a shitload of bad decisions, like costing Maverick the fight tonight as well. Probably the booze and cigarettes I'd imagine.
Either case, he makes a shitload of bad decisions, like costing Maverick the fight tonight as well. Probably the booze and cigarettes I'd imagine.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 27,020
- Reaction score
- 22,132
