It's pretty obvious that this guy was a child who was a victim of circumstance and his culpability is, at the very least *severely* diminished. Throwing a 15 year old into Guantanamo is also something no nation should be proud of. I would have no problem being a keynote at my university.
I think the only troubling thing is that many will say "
but he's a child!" when he lobbed a grenade at soldiers, but the general reaction to this kid was what it was:
I don't particularly like what this kid stands for but unlike Thunberg, Hogg, and Khadr, all of whom have received vociferous defenses on the ground that they were just children, I saw public figures threatening to throw this kid into a wood chipper and commenting that he had a "punchable face". I didn't see the same type of "he's just a child" defense materializing. The reaction in this forum was scarcely better and I'd be curious to see how many in this thread were either participating, or were conspicuously silent, when this kid was a popular target. Same deal for Barron Trump, who seems to be fair game in many circles.
I think we need to get our scripts straight on how much of a defense being under 18 years old is against public criticism and then stick to it regardless of which "side" the kid falls on.