Social Oklahoma High Schoolers to be Taught 2020 Election Conspiracy Theories as Fact

[HomeCheese]

After complaining how democrats wanted indoctrinate America's youth, the state of Oklahoma will be teaching their high schoolers 2020 election conspiracy theories as fact. In blatant disregard of reality, Oklahoma will be openly teaching their kids bull shit.

Clearly trying to indoctrinate the children into their way of thinking. In America, the facts don't seem to matter anymore. What a joke and this should make every person angry.

Oklahoma high schools to teach 2020 election conspiracy theories as fact

State superintendent Ryan Walters tapped chief of Heritage Foundation, key player behind Project 2025, for curriculum

www.theguardian.com

Maga doesn't care about the truth.

 

[Pittie Petey]

I got a sneaky suspicious that the Black British Stonehedge outrage crowd wont be as upset about this one

 

[jimmas99]

I got a sneaky suspicious that the Black British Stonehedge outrage crowd wont be as upset about this one

This won’t generate 20 pages like that one will

 

[pauljr1121]

Those books will also reinvent the Tulsa Massacre as the day eggs went up $.14

 

[HARRISON_3]

lol @ Oklahoma

 

[nhbbear]

How pathetic.

 

[nostradumbass]

Lol, "On no! We wanted to completely change the election rules and throw out security measures, then just ban anybody from mentioning it".

 

[Kingz]

Well, you can’t talk about the 2020 election without acknowledging basic facts about how the night went and criticism of the process. The biggest lie is that this was just one election of many throughout history with the same process. It wasn’t.

It wasn’t like any election before or since with the millions and millions of unsolicited mail in ballots, rushed constitutionally dubious rule changes in Democrat ran swing states in the lead up, and yes, the seemingly uniform late night pause in counting in Democrat strongholds throughout every swing state and the near uniform lead reversals everybody woke up to.

If it’s a history class. These things set the stage for the next couple of years so it’s fair to acknowledge and analyze the real and consistent grievances that led to other historical events.

They’ll come up better than the the people taught

“it was an election like any other, no difference in ballot distribution, collection, and counting. Late night pauses and 99 to 1 ballot dumps are normal and they were just mad they lost. Even though 4 million Democrat votes suddenly weren’t there a few years later”

I don’t advocate treating anything as fact. As in they should NOT be told this is evidence of Democrat cheating, but these sequence of events did happen and they can compare that to elections before and after and entered the critical thinking portion of the topic.

All I know is “not knowing who the winner is the night of the election and that’s normal” didn’t truly become a thing until Trump beat Clinton. Bush and Gore notwithstanding for completely different circumstances. They wanted to convince us this was the process now.

 

[HOLA]

It's like MAGA cultists are in a literal competition with each other to see who can debase themselves the most for Orange.

Absolutely everybody knows, except people who belong in an insane asylum, if they're not there already, that Trump is just a lying sore loser. Even Ivanka admitted it.

 

[Patof]

Is this what happens when your state is hit by tornadoes every other day?

 

[HOLA]

Isn't Oklahoma the state that tried to require the Trump bible in every school? lmao I can't even keep track of their freak stories anymore. Too many of them.

 

[jk7707]

Walters is a fucking nut job. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if his next decree was mandating an altar to Trump in every classroom.

 

[HomeCheese]

Well, you can’t talk about the 2020 election without acknowledging basic facts about how the night went and criticism of the process. The biggest lie is that this was just one election of many throughout history with the same process. It wasn’t.

It wasn’t like any election before or since with the millions and millions of unsolicited mail in ballots, rushed constitutionally dubious rule changes in Democrat ran swing states in the lead up, and yes, the seemingly uniform late night pause in counting in Democrat strongholds throughout every swing state and the near uniform lead reversals everybody woke up to.

If it’s a history class. These things set the stage for the next couple of years so it’s fair to acknowledge and analyze the real and consistent grievances that led to other historical events.

They’ll come up better than the the people taught

“it was an election like any other, no difference in ballot distribution, collection, and counting. Late night pauses and 99 to 1 ballot dumps are normal and they were just mad they lost. Even though 4 million Democrat votes suddenly weren’t there a few years later”

I don’t advocate treating anything as fact. As in they should NOT be told this is evidence of Democrat cheating, but these sequence of events did happen and they can compare that to elections before and after and entered the critical thinking portion of the topic.

All I know is “not knowing who the winner is the night of the election and that’s normal” didn’t truly become a thing until Trump beat Clinton. Bush and Gore notwithstanding for completely different circumstances. They wanted to convince us this was the process now.

What's an "unsolicited mail in ballot'?


You throw a lot of shade without any facts. For example, it was Pennsylvania conservatives that chanced the rules on when to count mail in ballots that lead to the delay in counting and confirming the outcome.

How many law suites on this have not only failed but been laughed out of court? Y'all need to let it go.

 

[HomeCheese]

BTW - Oklahoma is 48th in k-12 education.

 

[Stoic1]

Is it still a conspiracy if there are facts and evidence supporting it?

 

[BFoe]

All I know is “not knowing who the winner is the night of the election and that’s normal” didn’t truly become a thing until Trump beat Clinton. Bush and Gore notwithstanding for completely different circumstances. They wanted to convince us this was the process now.

The famous “Dewey Defeats Truman” headline would be another example, and outlets called the 1960 election at different times as well (some on election night, some the next day) but you’re kind of brushing off Bush-Gore here as well. I think the increased use of absentee/mail in ballots have played a role, but also things have just gotten so politically divided that we don’t really see landslides like Nixon and Reagan had anymore. Bush-Gore took time because it was very close. Other elections take time because the vote counts are close.

Rarely if ever in modern times have we counted every single ballot in the country in one night. The media makes projections based on the votes that have come in, which are usually right, but not always. This was never a problem until 2020 when I saw lots of Trump supporters posting “the media doesn’t get to decide!!!” nonsense.

Is it still a conspiracy if there are facts and evidence supporting it?

Except there aren’t, which is why Trump got bodied in court repeatedly.

 

[Axe720]

Well, you can’t talk about the 2020 election without acknowledging basic facts about how the night went and criticism of the process. The biggest lie is that this was just one election of many throughout history with the same process. It wasn’t.

It wasn’t like any election before or since with the millions and millions of unsolicited mail in ballots, rushed constitutionally dubious rule changes in Democrat ran swing states in the lead up, and yes, the seemingly uniform late night pause in counting in Democrat strongholds throughout every swing state and the near uniform lead reversals everybody woke up to.

If it’s a history class. These things set the stage for the next couple of years so it’s fair to acknowledge and analyze the real and consistent grievances that led to other historical events.

They’ll come up better than the the people taught

“it was an election like any other, no difference in ballot distribution, collection, and counting. Late night pauses and 99 to 1 ballot dumps are normal and they were just mad they lost. Even though 4 million Democrat votes suddenly weren’t there a few years later”

I don’t advocate treating anything as fact. As in they should NOT be told this is evidence of Democrat cheating, but these sequence of events did happen and they can compare that to elections before and after and entered the critical thinking portion of the topic.

All I know is “not knowing who the winner is the night of the election and that’s normal” didn’t truly become a thing until Trump beat Clinton. Bush and Gore notwithstanding for completely different circumstances. They wanted to convince us this was the process now.

You're right, but people aren't interested in critical thinking at the risk of cognitive dissonance, they're interested in reinforcing their bias, in this case in line with partisan loyalty.

If in a parallel universe, Trump got an extra 10-15 million votes that no candidate before him had gotten, there would be suspicion. If he got these extra votes during the one time a so-called emergency necessitated mail-in voting, and if many of said mail-in ballots were counted in private at locations that supposedly had water pipe breaks and power problems that required people to be removed from the area, there would be suspicion.

If, after this miraculous turning of the tide in ballot counting, social media giants literally disabled the ability to dislike posts because the public was reacting so negatively to the obvious shadiness in front of them, there would be suspicion.

Only in this parallel universe, it wouldn't just be people trying to have a civil discussion about the discrepancies and encourage people to be educated about the possibility of fraud. Buildings and cities would be on fire, and the same people who are scoffing at the idea of fraud now would be saying it was blatantly obvious.

 

[badascan]

There's the conspiracy and there's the theory... Different things

 

[HOLA]

You're right, but people aren't interested in critical thinking at the risk of cognitive dissonance, they're interested in reinforcing their bias, in this case in line with partisan loyalty.

If in a parallel universe, Trump got an extra 10-15 million votes that no candidate before him had gotten, there would be suspicion. If he got these extra votes during the one time a so-called emergency necessitated mail-in voting, and if many of said mail-in ballots were counted in private at locations that supposedly had water pipe breaks and power problems that required people to be removed from the area, there would be suspicion.

If, after this miraculous turning of the tide in ballot counting, social media giants literally disabled the ability to dislike posts because the public was reacting so negatively to the obvious shadiness in front of them, there would be suspicion.

Only in this parallel universe, it wouldn't just be people trying to have a civil discussion about the discrepancies and encourage people to be educated about the possibility of fraud. Buildings and cities would be on fire, and the same people who are scoffing at the idea of fraud now would be saying it was blatantly obvious.

lol at a Trumpist having the temerity to speak about cognitive dissonance and critical thinking. You guys are something else with your projection.

Trump's own handpicked AG, who really did his best to spin whatever he could for Trump, laughed and called it bullshit. Trump's own handpicked judges laughed it out of court.

How the fuck did Joe Biden rig the election when Trump was in power, then failed to do it when he was in power himself, with all his own people in key positions? How does that work? Wouldn't it be easier to do it when you're in power yourself, by a significant margin?

 

[HomeCheese]

Is it still a conspiracy if there are facts and evidence supporting it?

Show us the facts. Why did all the law suites fail miserably?

You guys complain about voter fraud but never offer any proof. It makes me wonder if you actually believe there was significant election fraud or if you are just trolling.