Unibet fixed the carmont via Decision now and I tried to get some confirmation on what would happen if it hit, and the customer support or w/e pretty much dodged the question over and over.
Exactly rille31. They are in a lose/void situation. Unibet are dirty like that.
Sweden.which unibet are you using? as in which country?
I personally wouldn't touch a bad line like that even if I could. I mean whats the benefit? a quick buck? and the disadvantage? being limited or bet not being honored. If you are a long term winner you wouldn't need to pick off bad lines like that anyway.
And good to see so many Swedish people in this thread, I always wondered what it would be like to live in those beautiful peaceful countries like Sweden and Norway.
Man some books I hear about are soo scummy. One of the benefits of having online gambling regulated in my country is that they can't do anything too dodgy . My book opened Carmont/Phillopou over 2.5 rounds at like +120 and the under at +100 (obviously a mistake) . I pounded the over and they paid up no dramas.
In fact the only time they have denied a payout was when they were late in pulling a fight down and I bet on a guy who had already won (which is fair enough) . There was no closing of my account, no stern telling off or any other nonsense I hear other books do in circumstances like that
Great new Midget! hope it hits for you man. My book uses a lot of european lines so I am checking my book every five minutes!
Maldonado has one of the best chins in MMA.
Tennis
Gasquet hits, Hewitt loses. Damn it, Hewitt lost some games which he definitely shouldn't have lost.
tell me about it. lost 4 freakin units. murray was fine, up 2 sets, and mysteriously blows the 3rd. i hate clay ><
This thread has been a good read. If anything I was considering signing up with Unibet to hit the Carmont dec line, but noticed it has changed now.
After reading this thread it sounds like I'm better off not signing up with them. For those of you who do have accounts with them I've noticed something else that looks off (nowhere near the Carmont decsion).
Similar to what ninjadeathcult mentions above:
Munoz vs Mousais goes the distance
Unibet Yes +100
Ladbrokes No +120
I think the fight probably goes the distance, and I'd be worried about Unibet voiding, but you could basically risk the ITD bet by placing the same at Unibet.
I'll have to check this thread after the event to see if they honoured the Carmont dec bet or not. Good luck to you who've placed it.
I know I've been stating the obvious but I'll say it another time for clear measure: Styles make fights!!!!
With that in mind I have a huge underdog play that I have a sneaking suspicion will hit like many of the underdogs that have been coming through.
Mark Munoz @ +230 is hard not to consider taking. I will always take a fighter who has more ways to win a fight. I can see Munoz taking Gegard down and then basically ground and pounding him for a split decision win.
Moussaka got exposed in the lawal fight. This same fighter who drawled against Keith jardine. The odds are again wrong in this circumstance. Take Munoz and don't be surprised if this fight is totally different than what oddsmakers put the lines at.