I used to watch boxing a lot in the 1990s, so I am definitely familiar with both fighters. I barely watch boxing anymore--the last fight that I saw was Mayweather VS McGregor. My thoughts:
-My belief was that I thought that the more technically proficient Roy Jones Jr. would pepper Mike Tyson with jabs throughout and coast to an easy win. I also based my prediction on the fact that Tyson hadn't fought in 15 years while Roy remained an active boxer up to only a few years ago.
-In the end, I thought that Tyson won the fight 78-74 (or 6 rounds to 2). I clearly think that the judges got it wrong. My thought is that just because you're former fighters, that does not make you qualified to judge fights.
-I liked how Tyson emphasized on going for body attacks. While Tyson was very successful in scoring knockouts by going for the head during his career, I always thought that he head-hunted as a crutch (look at his fight with Frans Botha where he was being outclassed for 5 rounds until he caught him). But tonight he appeared disciplined and used the opportunity to attack the body even more when Roy was clinching. Roy looked like he was wincing in pain and was very fatigued as a result of the punches to his body. He also acknowledged their effectiveness in the post fight interview.
-Tyson also cut off the ring very well, which surprised me.
Did Roy not properly prepare for the fight or did he simply just get overwhelmed by Tyson's power? He got lucky by getting out with a draw--which at the end of the day doesn't really matter. The fight was officially an exhibition and will not count towards any rankings or record keeping.