The criteria for banning a previously legal maneuver should that it caused an inordinate number of serious injuries. Keeping that criteria in mind, what fighters received career ending injuries from headbutts or injuries which required a long period of convalescence from which to return? I'd like to ask the same question about knees to the head of a downed opponent.
In comparison, are high kicls to the head historically safer than headsets or knees to the head of a downed opponent and if not, doesn't that make it obvious that the criteria for banning moves is not objective scientific criteria, but rather subjective criteria in which the ultimate arbiter has nothing to do with fighter safety?
In comparison, are high kicls to the head historically safer than headsets or knees to the head of a downed opponent and if not, doesn't that make it obvious that the criteria for banning moves is not objective scientific criteria, but rather subjective criteria in which the ultimate arbiter has nothing to do with fighter safety?