- Joined
- Nov 17, 2006
- Messages
- 49,592
- Reaction score
- 12,379
Lol what a reliable source
Its a recording of Hillary saying it in her own words, knock yourself out, or don't.
Lol what a reliable source
This is great. Nuclear war because Russia allegedly exposed the DNC for trying to undermine our election. How did this cry baby get elected to office twice?Obama holding emergency conference about russian hackers and Trumps election to be nullified.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-obama-pressconference-idUSKBN1442YG
Cnn fabrication story "Hackers had putins signature"
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/15/politics/russian-hacking-vladimir-putin-donald-trump/index.html
"Putin rigged the general election"
(((Reuters)))
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-cyber-idUSKBN1441RS
So what you're saying is even though non-government sources have confirmed this.. it's still an inside job?
What came out of those Hilary/DNC emails was a large point in why I voted for Trump (to stop her and that machine) than for 3rd party. I voted in Wisconsin
Not that I'm upset at all for Russian "influence" being that they exposed American government corruption to the people. I wish they or someone would have hit the RNC as well, but I only had one set of data to go off of and I wanted nothing of what I saw there
Calling what the C.I.A. does an "inside job" is a thinly veiled attempt to introduce tin foil into the discussion. This is what the C.I.A. does, its their job.
This is great. Nuclear war because Russia allegedly exposed the DNC for trying to undermine our election. How did this cry baby get elected to office twice?
Trying to conflate the world's other major nuclear power hacking emails with hacking the voting machines is probably the most reckless and irresponsible thing the US Government has done in the entirety of it's existence. Mind you, they are doing all of this with no proof and also doing it as Julian Assange say's "ITS NOT THE RUSSIANS"!But no one hacked the voting. They can go fuck themselves.
Trying to conflate the world's other major nuclear power hacking emails with hacking the voting machines is probably the most reckless and irresponsible thing the US Government has done in the entirety of it's existence. Mind you, they are doing all of this with no proof and also doing it as Julian Assange say's "ITS NOT THE RUSSIANS"!
It is also now apparent that Hillary started mentioning the Russians as an escape clause in the event she lost. She tried to make Trump look petty for saying he would have to look at election results (as the leading e-fraud statisticians said HRC engaged in mass election fraud vs Bernie) as she promised not to question the election results, only to fund Jill Stein to do a recount and then to have Obama, CIA and her other fellow globalists say that Russia stole/tampered with the election. However fun it may be to scapegoat Hillary, it is obvious that even if she has little to do with all that is going on and is just really a puppet in a much larger, darker organization. Even if she said 'wait, I just want out...I have parkinsons and I just need to rest", they would make her do whatever they wanted, as the Clintons made ALOT of promises to ALOT of very powerful and nefarious characters and those people want their money back or they want was promised to them.
To those that think this is over, even if Trump gets the needed electoral votes, think again. The Supreme Court's make up, for maybe the next 50 years, lays in the balance as well as TTP, TTIP and TISA. Brexit just happened, nationalist sentiments are popping up all over the globe and the EU is starting to fall apart. Facebook is shutting down non government propaganda (think about how openly bold that is). Globalism is being rejected and the people are pissed at what the oligarch Globalists have done. US is at the epicenter of all of this and they aren't going to let their hold on the world and their resources slip away without a fight.
No, it's the CIA's job to do this to foreign governments, not ours.
Where is the CIA's incentive for lying here?
Its impossible for me to predict what the C.I.A.'s motives are, mostly they act as a scapegoat for what Washington wants to do. Once they get caught in their bullshit repeatedly, I don't need to know their motives to know they are professional shit starters, its their entire purpose.
So your stance is the following...
"I don't know what's going on, but I'm just going to assume things anyway"
Trump needs to fire back at some point. Hold his own press conference to address this. This rhetoric is snowballing at a ridiculous pace.
It's gone from "we believe Russia hacked the DNC", to "Putin personally directed the attack" in less than a week. Next it will be "Trump conspired with Putin to hack the DNC". Count on it.
It's painfully obvious that they are trying to steal the election. This isn't about national security. It's all political, and Trump needs to fire back on something other than Twitter.
Its precisely your stance.
My stance is that I don't need to know what is going on when it comes to the C.I.A., they don't tell the truth about anything. Ever.
His secretary of god damn state pick is a billionaire oil exec with ties to Russia. How fucking clear does this have to be?
Trump doing exactly what he should. Reminding people what was in the leaks.
Good man. Some lowly insectlike journalist at CNN/Huff Po just read that tweet and started gnawing on their own arm in frustration.