- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
- Messages
- 17,654
- Reaction score
- 11,218
Yet again I see you running apologism for this racist bullshit that is always either outright factually inaccurate or a laughable defense. We've seen differences at the Ivy leagues as great as ~400 exposed.
First, 1290 vs. a 1470-1570 average isn't "100" points. It's not even 200 points. It's closer to 250 points. When 310 points is the maximum difference that could separate it. In terms of the difference between populations along the curve, that's a grand canyon sized chasm. It's the difference between someone in the 87th percentile and someone in the 99th percentile.
The first student is excellent. The second is extraordinary.
Source on a 400 point difference at Ivy Leagues, please. And I trust these are group averages, not individual scores.
If they do exist then I do think it's unfair. 400 points is too much.
NYU has a 196-point difference and that's within the 100-200 range that I mentioned. I work for a large state university and have access to data and know for a fact that at this level, the difference is around 100 points. And finally, I have no problem with an "extraordinary" student not getting into NYU because there's about a 99.9% chance that they got into another one of the extremely prestigious schools they applied to. They'll be alright.
Of course, in a country of 340 million, there's some that'll fall through the cracks so that one Asian kid that with a 1580 or whatever and got job a Google is an exception (and even he really did get accepted at several schools, just not his very top choices, iirc). Point is, it's not a systemic problem.