NY woman sentenced to 15 years in prison for killing husband

[tonni]

You said 75% are killed after they leave.
I suggest you either own up to the dishonesty or drop it but you can continue being disingenuous if you want

In reference to an article titled

Private Violence: up to 75% of abused women who are murdered are killed after they leave their partners

 

[Deleted member 159002]

Yes, technically, but I posted a link that should've provided context to the statement. I didn't even realize people were up in arms about me not literally quoting the article title until I was told. I seriously couldn't imagine people being this stupid/disingenuous, I'm too blame here really.

TBF it's best not to make ambiguous statements, especially on political topics.

 

[WhiteMousse]

In reference to an article titled

Lol you edited your post. Dude whatever. I guess you have enough people barking at you here. I like you but you goofed

 

[tonni]

TBF it's best not to make ambiguous statements, especially on political topics.

I seriously did not think that was ambiguous in the context I put that sentence in.

 

[tonni]

Lol you edited your post. Dude whatever. I guess you have enough people barking at you here. I like you but you goofed

Yeah, I didn't edit the original part, I added a little extra just to help people out.

 

[HereticBD]

How is it an erroneous statement if I posted an article before? Did you seriously think I thought that 3/4 women get murdered after they left, was that really the reasonable assumption?

Because it's what you said, and it's not uncommon for people to misread/misinterpret the links they are sharing to back up a point they were trying to make.

It sounds like you're just being defensive after telling everyone that they couldn't read, when it was actually you who posted false information off of what they had read. Now you're just trying to play it off like you didn't mean to, because you're embarrassed.

 

[tonni]

Okay I admit I made that post because I killed around 75% of my exes and I thought everyone else did too.

 

[tonni]

Because it's what you said, and it's not uncommon for people to misread/misinterpret the links they are sharing to back up a point they were trying to make.

It sounds like you're just being defensive after telling everyone that they couldn't read, when it was actually you who posted false information off of what they had read. Now you're just trying to play it off like you didn't mean to, because you're embarrassed.

Why would I think that 75% of women who leave their partner get murdered? My god you guys hold me in the lowest regard hahahah

 

[Trotsky]

So they're most at risk after they leave their partner. That reading comprehension up in here.

Dude, you're only counting the ones that are murdered.

Stats much?

I never commented on that so I'm not sure why you ask. The chance of getting murdered is higher if they leave their partner, statistically. That's what I originally stated but you all lack the reading comprehension or are just being obtuse.

Yeah, but what percentage of abusive relationships end in murder? That's what matters.

 

[tonni]

Dude, you're only counting the ones that are murdered.

Stats much?



Yeah, but what percentage of abusive relationships end in murder? That's what matters.

75% of my serious posts result in me being murdered after I leave for work

 

[Mcountry]

I said "75% are killed after they leave" in reference to an article titled

"Private Violence: up to 75% of abused women who are murdered are killed after they leave their partners"

I don't know how you could interpret it as me actually thinking 3/4 women who leave their partner are murdered without being either a moron or just purposefully annoying. I'm probably being trolled very hard right now.

Because the conversation about this case is based around the judges ruling;


Nicole Addimando 'had the opportunity to safely leave,' denied lenient sentencing: Judge

Before delivering the sentence, McLoughlin told Addimando no punishment "would be more severe than explaining to your children someday what happened and why."

He continued to say Addimando "didn't have to kill him."

And he's exactly right.

As she had no way of knowing that he would have elevated his game to murder. Nobody in this thread has posted statistics to tell me what the likelihood of an abusive spouse committing murder is.

It's as useless as saying "well they are most likely to use a hand gun"...

So jumping into this thread and telling us the statistics of what point in the relationship most of the murders happen of those who are murdered doesn't really counter the judges argument, or add to the discussion.

I guess at best it's an interesting factoid?

 

[tonni]

Because the conversation about this case is based around the judges ruling;


Nicole Addimando 'had the opportunity to safely leave,' denied lenient sentencing: Judge

Before delivering the sentence, McLoughlin told Addimando no punishment "would be more severe than explaining to your children someday what happened and why."

He continued to say Addimando "didn't have to kill him."

And he's exactly right.

As she had no way of knowing that he would have elevated his game to murder. Nobody in this thread has posted statistics to tell me what the likelihood of an abusive spouse committing murder is.

It's as useless as saying "well they are most likely to use a hand gun"...

So jumping into this thread and telling us the statistics of what point in the relationship most of the murders happen of those who are murdered doesn't really counter the judges argument, or add to the discussion.

I guess at best it's an interesting factoid?

The safest bet for her would have been staying, I thought it was in fact interesting seeing as how the judge said she could safely leave. If she was convinced he was going to kill her, leaving would be the most dangerous option. That's why I said "regardless of guilt" because it's not good advice to give battered women.

 

[Mcountry]

The safest bet for her would have been staying, I thought it was in fact interesting seeing as how the judge said she could safely leave. If she was convinced he was going to kill her, leaving would be the most dangerous option. That's why I said "regardless of guilt" because it's not good advice to give battered women.

"She was convinced" is a very subjective statement. And not much of a defense to ending a life. The safest bet would be for her to leave the relationship. And cut all ties with her spouse.

 

[tonni]

"She was convinced" is a very subjective statement. And not much of a defense to ending a life. The safest bet would be for her to leave the relationship. And cut all ties with her spouse.

I didn't say it was a good defense, I do not think it is. I said "regardless of guilt" after which I made a general consideration about the judge's comment. If his intent was to murder her, or if you had the power of clairvoyance and you knew 100% for sure his intent was to murder her, the safest bet would not be leaving. In fact, that would statistically be a "reckless" thing to do.

It's a depressing stat, really.

 

[Trotsky]

75% of my serious posts result in me being murdered after I leave for work

Yeah, obviously you're right in all of this and have honed in on what matters (and posters like Heretic probably realize it but are shameless enough to still join the mob), but I don't care enough to jump in on your behalf.

 

[HereticBD]

Yeah, obviously you're right in all of this and have honed in on what matters (and posters like Heretic probably realize it but are shameless enough to still join the mob), but I don't care enough to jump in on your behalf.

LOL @ "I don't care to jump in on your behalf"


Also, LOL @tonni running to the Safe Space Lounge for support.

 

[tonni]

Yeah, obviously you're right in all of this

That's all I wanted.

 

[tonni]

LOL @ "I don't care to jump in on your behalf"


Also, LOL @tonni running to the Safe Space Lounge for support.

Aren't you posting in the Lounge too?

 

[Mcountry]

I didn't say it was a good defense, I do not think it is. I said "regardless of guilt" after which I made a general consideration about the judge's comment. If his intent was to murder her, or if you had the power of clairvoyance and you knew 100% for sure his intent was to murder her, the safest bet would not be leaving. In fact, that would statistically be a "reckless" thing to do.

It's a depressing stat, really.

The safest bet is never staying with an abusive partner.

Ever.

If anything, that stat just tells you that if you want to leave, get the cops to escort you out of the house, and take all precautions necessary after the fact.

Like if I gave you a stat that suggested most abusive partners that decide to murder their partners, use piano wire to strangle their victims...might wanna sell the piano before you leave.

 

[tonni]

The safest bet is never staying with an abusive partner.

Ever.

If anything, that stat just tells you that if you want to leave, get the cops to escort you out of the house, and take all precautions necessary after the fact.

It's almost a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. You have to really plan ahead, be decisive and have a country with a decent safety net in place. Still at a higher risk in the first couple of weeks.