Nunes/Tate looked like what Holm/Tate should have

CombatScience

Blue Belt
@Blue
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
858
Reaction score
81
If Holm was more aggressive Tate would have been done in the 1st round. Holm didn't have any business losing to a fighter on Tates caliber. Shame on Holm.

Nunes vs Holm next.
 
I'm glad Tate lost, talk about getting a big head... She became arrogant over night.
 
Except that it didn't and Miesha choked her out.

It's fighting shit happens breh
 
This is exactly what i thought. I always felt that Holm was extremely unlucky to lose the fight against Tate. She was clearly dominating up until the last couple of minutes.

I had a feeling Nunes would win this easily, Tate is overrated, and once her wrestling is nullified she is basically just a punching bag for anyone with decent striking.
 
ohh please Holms just got a gift in Rousey poor game plan . Holms is just a point fighter and boring fighter..
wait and watch how she gets destroyed again and again
 
Except Holm was afraid of being taken down, and justifiably so. Amanda wasn't, at least in the opening minutes of the fight.
 
Holly looked completely lost in the grappling versus Tate both early in the fight and again in the last round. It's not even like Holly was rocked when she got subbed.

We all love Holm for KTFO Ronda but lets not pretend she was on another level and Tate just got lucky.
 
This is exactly what i thought. I always felt that Holm was extremely unlucky to lose the fight against Tate. She was clearly dominating up until the last couple of minutes.

I had a feeling Nunes would win this easily, Tate is overrated, and once her wrestling is nullified she is basically just a punching bag for anyone with decent striking.

I fail to see how Holm was unlucky. She failed to beat the "punching bag", that's not being unlucky.
 
Wasn't Tate complaining about her pay not so long ago ?
Yet she overlooked Nunes and got absolutely destroyed..
She had all the cards in hands to be Ronda's seconds coming (until their unavoidable rematch) and milk it to the max especially after Bones's mess up and being propelled Main Event of the biggest card ever

She probably lost millions in sponsors pay/salary/media sollicitations...

Talk about missing a "once in a life opportunity"..
The saltyness will be epic on this one..
 
They're different fighters. If Holly was more aggressive she would be at greatly increased risk of getting taken down. She is a counter fighter, a damn good one. Amanda Nunes is an aggressive fighter, a damn good one.

For Holly to perfect an aggressive striking style, which keeps someone like Miesha on the end of her punches, while staying at a perfect range to defend TD, she would have to change the way she fights/trains considerably.

This is the exact reason that Holly looked amazing against Ronda, but not so amazing against Tate & Pennington. Ronda played right into her hands by charging forward.

It's not as simple as Holly being "more aggressive"
 
I don't see the connection here, from what I saw from Holly, granted that's not much, she seems to have a very different skill set than Amanda.
 
ohh please Holms just got a gift in Rousey poor game plan . Holms is just a point fighter and boring fighter..
wait and watch how she gets destroyed again and again

Lol, you could make that argument for any loss. Cat was a gift to Ronda, for example.
 
Last edited:
I'm glad Tate lost, talk about getting a big head... She became arrogant over night.
She was always arrogant. It was so painfully obvious that she wasn't likely to defend her title even once.
 
Delusional Holmboys at it again.
Holm had one bright moment in her mma career.
Just one. She 's the mediocre one not Tate.
 
They're different fighters. If Holly was more aggressive she would be at greatly increased risk of getting taken down. She is a counter fighter, a damn good one. Amanda Nunes is an aggressive fighter, a damn good one.

For Holly to perfect an aggressive striking style, which keeps someone like Miesha on the end of her punches, while staying at a perfect range to defend TD, she would have to change the way she fights/trains considerably.

This is the exact reason that Holly looked amazing against Ronda, but not so amazing against Tate & Pennington. Ronda played right into her hands by charging forward.

It's not as simple as Holly being "more aggressive"

People must also Remember that Nunes is basically a female Vitor Belfort. Comes in aggressive, goes all out for the finish, then gasses halfway through the second if unsuccessful. Holm is more akin to Machida's counter-striking, which can admittedly make for slow fights here and there, but also displays a techinal brilliance that tends to create some beautiful knockouts. The kind you remember.
 
Holly looked completely lost in the grappling versus Tate both early in the fight and again in the last round. It's not even like Holly was rocked when she got subbed.


We all love Holm for KTFO Ronda but lets not pretend she was on another level and Tate just got lucky.

gotta agree with that Holly ground game is pretty poor.

Joanna showed even if shes been taken down she can defend, get up and make them pay for that take down.
 
I agree. I thought Amanda would be to quick and hits hard on top of that. Holly really didn't do anything the entire fight other then try to defend takedowns. I can't even remember a time where she landed anythjng and she could have.
 
I'm glad Tate lost, talk about getting a big head... She became arrogant over night.

I thought her boxing looked OK versus Nunes. But you shouldn't go in there to prove ANYTHING in a five round title fight. She should have been thinking nothing but takedown to wear Nunes down, that remains the blueprint to beat Nunes in my opinion.
 
Holly is a technician not a fast twitch bomber.
 
Nunes is a BJJ black belt and she also trains judo. She can commit to her punches without fear. Holly is a white belt.
 
Back
Top