I came across this article, and it's old but I never saw it posted on here and the search function didn't bring up anything. I'm so sick of reading people discount Lawler and acting like Condit clearly won the fight. Lawler is a great fighter, a great champion, and he won the fight with Condit using the unified scoring system. http://espn.go.com/blog/mma/post/_/id/22825/nsac-lawler-condit-decision-was-correct The meaningless fightmetric statistics are just that: MEANINGLESS! Lawler landed the damaging strikes in the 3rd round, he had Condit backing up, and most of Condit's strikes missed and almost none of them were damaging except for maybe a couple toward the end of the round. He didn't do anything for most of the round and when Robbie hit him, he was clearly affected and moving backward. I understand it was a close fight, but the disrespect toward Lawler is insane on here. Plus, Lawler/Hendricks II was clearly 1,4,5 Lawler -- how could you give Hendricks the first round? Robbie fucked him up in the beginning and all Hendricks did was get a TD toward the end.