- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 11,265
- Reaction score
- 0
Everything I said was referring to the DNC hack.They can definitely pinpoint that some Russian actors hacked in some systems. The wordings from the President and the non-named sources in the newspapers as well as Brennan and supposedly others, only say Russians. They don't mention what they hacked ( probably won't because of " security reasons ), or exactly who it was that hacked.
Give us the fucking details is all I ask for, and I imagine most rational people want that as well. What effects did those " hacks " have? I hope there is a Congressional inquiry/investigation and it shows that those hacks were then sent to Wikileaks and then put online for the world to see.
Because, let's be clear here, the only information ( hacked or leaked ) that was shared or exploited in various media, were the emails from Wikileaks.
If not, then the Dems won't win another election in the next 32 years.
But the same will be true for anything else. Most likely there won't be actual hard evidence of the Kremlin hacking into anything ever, as long as they don't suffer from massive leaks themselves.
Their approach will always be similar to what I described above if they want a system compromised. That's why it's important to avoid cyber attacks in advance and not bitch about it later.