Sure, but you'll be dealing with an event where everyone can actually see it and evaluate what they see, which is far better than evaluating the he said/she said version.
I dunno, hey. Look at threads here with video evidence. We're not talking about quality, contextualised video. We're talking about shakey footage that offers the illusion of 'objective reality' but is in actuality very open to interpretation.
At the point of interpretation, people make their minds up about the intention of the interpretation. Things come to the same place as they do without video: If you don't agree with me, you're a Nazi-racist/Communist-soyboy. The sort of video that makes it onto social media, I don't think adds anything of value to a conversation; mostly they appear to just make people feel more comfortable about the convictions they already held.
"Weaponized as a tool for division" is only true if you don't believe that the division already existed.
No, it's not. I don't think this assertion makes any sense at all.
Something can exacerbate a pre-existing faultine.
People have been complaining about this very issue for decades.
And the issue's less of an issue than it has ever been.
The introduction of social media and cell phone cameras didn't create it, it only recorded it.
There's no such thing as "only recorded it."
The introduction of social media and cell phone cameras magnified it and made it a disproportionate presence in people's lives. It also brought in the "15 minutes of fame" angle, that has often been used to criticise media coverage of mass shooters - everyone now has the chance for a moment of infamy.
And, deny it all you want, but people take advantage of things like that, and it adds another wrinkle to the problem; jackasses acting like cartoon characters in hopes of becoming their team's favourite internet meme, or snowflakes wholeheartedly embracing the opportunity to be praised for being a victim.
This is not even touching on the fact that, in the current domain of public opinion, it seems that any time someone white does something unpleasant to someone black, it's automatically assumed to be racially motivated. For fuck's sake, we have video evidence of Chauvin brutally killing George Floyd, and even
that wasn't enough on its own - the assumption of a racial angle, for which there is
absolutely no video evidence, was just casually tacked on and run with.
In the recent riots, we've seen very strategic use of 'video evidence' employed to frame a situation according to a certain narrative. Sometimes it's as simple as instigating shit a moment before hitting 'record'.
"Only recorded it," my ass.
But I suppose there is/was a subsection of the population who were unaware that the people complaining about these issues have been making the same complaints for decades.
You mean the issues that've been improving for decades?
That doesn't make the division new, it just means that that subset has finally started paying attention to it.
No one said the division was new, you're just working off of the weird assumption that a pre-existing division can't be worsened and that a weapon for division can only be utilised against people who are undivided. The division has been obvious for a while, hence the conspiracy theories that foreign actors have been nudging the discontent along.
People "started paying attention" because social media, video, etc have exaggerated the issue by emotionally charging them. You see ten videos of pieces of shit being pieces of shit, and it becomes very easy to forget that you live in a country of 320M people and that those ten videos are not really representative of much at all.
Take it to the next level, and maybe there are thousands and thousands of videos showing examples of "racism" - at that point, no one has the time to watch them all. No one that everyone trusts is vetting them, categorizing them according to their legitimacy, intensity, etc, etc.
That's not evidence. Not in any meaningful sense. That's just ammunition that each side can use against the other.
You're basically just arguing for more emotion to be thrown onto the fire.