NOW UFC 200 is junk

johncola

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
9,310
Reaction score
547
You were all whiney overreacting bitches before.

But now that your king has dropped off the card, UFC 200 is shit.
 
No, it was shit before too.
 
You were all whiney overreacting bitches before.

But now that your king has dropped off the card, UFC 200 is shit.

I am actually more excited now. They will definitely replace Conor/Diaz with a real title fight that isn't a really stupid rematch that Conor didn't even deserve.
 
This actually may save the card.

If they get Jones/DC II, GSP/Lawler, Aldo/Frankie, and others

That card would be better than UfC 100 was.

The Conor/Nate fight was what was making the card a circus show.
 
I am actually more excited now. They will definitely replace Conor/Diaz with a real title fight that isn't a really stupid rematch that Conor didn't even deserve.

A real title like RDA/Alvarez?
 
Jon Jones needs to call his agent RIGHT NOW and demand 10 mil!
 
ufc 200 is better without the pointless bullshit that was conor vs nate,
 
It was shit before you 2019 fan
 
Any of you who are happy that Conor isn't fighting on the card should find another hobby. You don't actually like watching fights
 
Tate vs. Nunes is going to break records and blow minds.
 
Any of you who are happy that Conor isn't fighting on the card should find another hobby. You don't actually like watching fights

I like competitive fights, which is why Diaz/Conor 2 was universally known as a waste of everyones time and money.
 
I like competitive fights, which is why Diaz/Conor 2 was universally known as a waste of everyones time and money.
No, the complaints were about people wanting Conor to defend his belt, and people being tired of all the rematches. The betting lines reflect that this was viewed as a competitive fight. The first fight was competitive so that by itself is good reason to think the second one would be.

Anyway, you're anti-Conor, repeatedly show a lack of brainpower in your posts, and have run from me before, so I'd be an idiot to expect good posts from you at this point.
 
It gives this card a chance to actually have a worthy match headline...maybe an actual title fight will be scheduled now lol.
 
I thought it was a completely meaningless fight in the first place, so I see upside with it being potentially replaced with a meaningful main event.
 
No, the complaints were about people wanting Conor to defend his belt, and people being tired of all the rematches.

Not really though. People thought it was a stupid fight for a multitude of reasons. What you said, and.... wait for it.... because Conor has little chance to win. He got decisively finished by someone on 11 days notice. Beating full camp Diaz wasn't likely to happen.

Yeah, fighting above his weight class where he's the champion while two FW contenders are fighting for an interim belt on the same exact card is retarded too. Still doesn't change the fact that the rematch was pointless.

lol at the "everyone was tired of all the rematches" blanket statement. Yeah, exactly. Nobody wants to see a rematch if it's not going to be fucking competitive. It's one of the MANY reasons people don't like rematches. It's not the most perplexing thing in the world to grasp. Holy shit. You somehow managed to reinforce my point as opposed to argue against it.

The betting lines reflect that this was viewed as a competitive fight.

>referencing betting lines as to why a fight can be competitive

A lot of people saw that fight as easy money.

The first fight was competitive so that by itself is good reason to think the second one would be.

Except it really wasn't. Every overhand left that Conor was spamming was getting him that much closer to his demise. Ever heard of the Tortoise and the Hare?

Conor "blew his gasket" in round 1 and early parts of round 2 against a notorious slow starter that had 11 days notice to boot, and he still only landed 37% of his strikes in round one. That's embarrassing.
 
Back
Top