- Joined
- Nov 20, 2015
- Messages
- 3,549
- Reaction score
- 2,158
Does Jacare-Brunson 2 need to be five rounds? What's so special about that fight beyond it being just a good fight? It's not so prestigious as to warrant five rounds. No title is on the line. No guaranteed title shot is on the line. Nothing is on the line.
Jacare-Brunson 2 is not going to be a better fight because of two extra rounds. One can argue it'll be worse. They'll understandably pace themselves more which may lead to less action.
And before you say it, Hendo-Shogun 1 and Hunt-Bigfoot 1 are all time classics. But for every one of those, there are 10 to 20 Machida-Anders five round main events.
Even if Jacare-Brunson 2 is not the best example, why should Stephens-Emmett be five rounds?
Jacare-Brunson 2 is not going to be a better fight because of two extra rounds. One can argue it'll be worse. They'll understandably pace themselves more which may lead to less action.
And before you say it, Hendo-Shogun 1 and Hunt-Bigfoot 1 are all time classics. But for every one of those, there are 10 to 20 Machida-Anders five round main events.
Even if Jacare-Brunson 2 is not the best example, why should Stephens-Emmett be five rounds?