no sex outside of marraige if GOP gets its way

curryjunkie

mixed marital arts...
@Silver
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
13,290
Reaction score
10,043
https://thinkprogress.org/first-amendment-defense-act-reintroduction-cd3178eb8714/
Utah (where else?) wants to introduce a law that makes it ok to discriminate , not just against gays, but anyone they deem to be practicing premarital sex
  • Government employees could refuse to serve married same-sex couples and their families, such as processing tax returns, visa applications, or Social Security checks.
  • Employers could refuse to grant employees family or medical leave to take care of their same-sex spouses.
  • Employers could fire an unmarried female employee for getting pregnant.
  • Hospitals could refuse to allow visitation to same-sex partners and spouses.
  • Social services like homeless shelters, drug treatment programs, and adoption agencies could turn away anyone who has had sex outside of a man-woman marriage.
  • Commercial landlords could refuse to provide housing to a single mother. Welcome to 1953 everyone
 
Yet conservatives want to add another conservative justice to SCOTUS to guarantee shit like this is upheld
 
https://thinkprogress.org/first-amendment-defense-act-reintroduction-cd3178eb8714/
Utah (where else?) wants to introduce a law that makes it ok to discriminate , not just against gays, but anyone they deem to be practicing premarital sex
  • Government employees could refuse to serve married same-sex couples and their families, such as processing tax returns, visa applications, or Social Security checks.
  • Employers could refuse to grant employees family or medical leave to take care of their same-sex spouses.
  • Employers could fire an unmarried female employee for getting pregnant.
  • Hospitals could refuse to allow visitation to same-sex partners and spouses.
  • Social services like homeless shelters, drug treatment programs, and adoption agencies could turn away anyone who has had sex outside of a man-woman marriage.
  • Commercial landlords could refuse to provide housing to a single mother. Welcome to 1953 everyone

None of this will happen. ITs just puffery to please the constituents.
 
Yet conservatives want to add another conservative justice to SCOTUS to guarantee shit like this is upheld

Still better than an all out Orwellian progessive society.

Sometimes you have to pick the lesser of two evils, and progessives have become so dangerous and disgusting, they're even less preferrable to Christian GOP idiots.

It's the truth.
 
More than anything, this is just grating in that it's a huge waste of political capital and an exceedingly stupid law. Its only functionality is to throw a ludicrous first amendment road block in the clear trajectory of Supreme Court jurisprudence of the CRA.

Also, no one fucking discriminates against people who denounce extramarital affairs you brain-dead victim-complexing rubes.

Morons gonna moron

Fixed

Still better than an all out Orwellian progessive society.

Sometimes you have to pick the lesser of two evils, and progessives have become so dangerous and disgusting, they're even less preferrable to Christian GOP idiots.

It's the truth.

See here for morons moroning (EDIT: particularly, citing to a Trotskyist to disparage leftism lol)
 
Last edited:
im-not-surprised-rb1ien.jpg
 
Think progress
I’m out


Could be accurate could not be
 
Still better than an all out Orwellian progessive society.

Sometimes you have to pick the lesser of two evils, and progessives have become so dangerous and disgusting, they're even less preferrable to Christian GOP idiots.

It's the truth.
The destruction of equal rights is not more dangerous than the left justices on the court .Hell Garland is a mix who would've been perfect
In his Harvard Law Review article, Garland wrote that Congress had “plainly” left up to executive agencies “the choice of the best means of effectuating [their] statutory purposes.” He opposed judges imposing their own desired policy outcome. “Adoption of a ‘best’ policy requirement,” Garland wrote, “would all but guarantee substitution of the court’s judgment for that of the agency.”

Liberal SCOTUS isn't coming for your guns .Here's a great article on SCOTUS and the 2A

Also, this big brother idea expanded like crazy under a GOP POTUS and House and a dem Senate. It's been continued ever since. So there goes the big brother argument
 
If Republicans had their way laws would be governed according to the bible. So much for "muh freedoms".

Still better than an all out Orwellian progessive society.

Sometimes you have to pick the lesser of two evils, and progessives have become so dangerous and disgusting, they're even less preferrable to Christian GOP idiots.

It's the truth.

Lucky for you there won't be any discrimination coming your way because you're clearly a virgin.

I've never seen someone so scared of liberals.
 
Still better than an all out Orwellian progessive society.

Sometimes you have to pick the lesser of two evils, and progessives have become so dangerous and disgusting, they're even less preferrable to Christian GOP idiots.

It's the truth.
im not sure you understand what the term "Orwellian" means
 
If Republicans had their way laws would be governed according to the bible. So much for "muh freedoms".



Lucky for you there won't be any discrimination coming your way because you're clearly a virgin.

I've never seen someone so scared of liberals.

Maybe he is a Muslim waiting for marriage. You islamaphobic? Why make fun

Khabib was a virgin till marriage
 
https://thinkprogress.org/first-amendment-defense-act-reintroduction-cd3178eb8714/
Utah (where else?) wants to introduce a law that makes it ok to discriminate , not just against gays, but anyone they deem to be practicing premarital sex
  • Government employees could refuse to serve married same-sex couples and their families, such as processing tax returns, visa applications, or Social Security checks.
  • Employers could refuse to grant employees family or medical leave to take care of their same-sex spouses.
  • Employers could fire an unmarried female employee for getting pregnant.
  • Hospitals could refuse to allow visitation to same-sex partners and spouses.
  • Social services like homeless shelters, drug treatment programs, and adoption agencies could turn away anyone who has had sex outside of a man-woman marriage.
  • Commercial landlords could refuse to provide housing to a single mother. Welcome to 1953 everyone
Sounds like sharia law, I thought those anti-sharia bills would protect us from this?
 
Think progress
I’m out


Could be accurate could not be
yep, they totally made it up, its not recorded anywhere else.........buuut, assuming its not, would you care to comment on the actual proposed legislation?
 
Back
Top