- Joined
- Aug 15, 2019
- Messages
- 6,042
- Reaction score
- 12,053
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/
Like the title says. Pretty straight forward:
In other words, support for BLM is steadily declining due to the perception that the riots are associated with BLM.
This article also goes into how some media outlets have gone to absurd lengths to downplay the riots:
It also goes into context at how Democratic leaders are calling for the abolishing and supporting BLM, yet using the same police they're trying to get rid of to protect them because they think they're above everyone else:
One last thing I'm sick of hearing, is that the riots and rioters are not associated with BLM. What the fuck? Of course they are! Everywhere BLM goes, so does the violence, looting, arson and vandalism. Not to mention the majority of idiots arrested have BLM written all over their attire.
Look, we all can agree that racism is an issue that needs to be tackled. But BLM has completely fucked this up with their lack of leadership and not seeming to have an end goal. Defund police is not a goal, it's just a stupid talking point that clearly has not substance behind it.
Democrats, BLM, do better.
Like the title says. Pretty straight forward:
Net approval for the Black Lives Matter movement peaked back on June 3 and has fallen sharply since. This was just over a week after George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis, when riots had begun to sweep major cities. Among whites, net approval is already negative and headed downward. And while Democrats and Republicans are as polarized on the issue as one would expect, white Independents have shown a dramatic falloff in BLM support, going from a net 24% in early June to net 3% now, which is lower than before Floyd was killed
In other words, support for BLM is steadily declining due to the perception that the riots are associated with BLM.
This article also goes into how some media outlets have gone to absurd lengths to downplay the riots:
Press outlets have generally tried to downplay the violent aspects of the protests, sometimes going to absurd lengths. CNN’s Omar Jimenez reported live from Kenosha in front of burning businesses while a chyron described the scene as “fiery but mostly peaceful protests.” The narrative “buildings burn at peaceful protest” is Orwellian doublethink in action.
It also goes into context at how Democratic leaders are calling for the abolishing and supporting BLM, yet using the same police they're trying to get rid of to protect them because they think they're above everyone else:
Then there are the cases of bad optics. Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot pegged the entitlement meter when she unapologetically claimed that a heavy police presence around her block during Chicago’s disturbances was necessary because her family has “a right in our home to live in peace.” Unlike, apparently, everyone else in Chicago
One last thing I'm sick of hearing, is that the riots and rioters are not associated with BLM. What the fuck? Of course they are! Everywhere BLM goes, so does the violence, looting, arson and vandalism. Not to mention the majority of idiots arrested have BLM written all over their attire.
Look, we all can agree that racism is an issue that needs to be tackled. But BLM has completely fucked this up with their lack of leadership and not seeming to have an end goal. Defund police is not a goal, it's just a stupid talking point that clearly has not substance behind it.
Democrats, BLM, do better.