legitimate curiosity, not trying to troll up an argument, is there legitimate evidence of reduced pokes with those gloves in use?
They look like they'd help, just curious if there's factual backing. I haven't watched a Pride fight in over a decade, only ever watched the big ones after the fact, so I don't really know. Was never really looking out for eye pokes in what I did watch.
It's one thing to say they'd help because they look like they would, but if Pride or other orgs with similar gloves saw significantly less, or no poke injuries, then it'd be damn hard for Dana and company to argue it.
Those don't look like they'd have any negative impact on submissions or anything like that, either.