Mma on paper (stats) suck and you found a huge issue with these boxing judges. Significant strikes cant be seen as the same regardless of the actual impact of the strike. Nick was barely throwing and wouldnt hurt 1 single sherbro with that performance. I will give nick around 20 good shots in that fight while robbie had alot morePaddy-cake punches aren't 'significant strikes.'
And if they're counted as significant strikes, that counter is a joke.
Think about it. Hard over-hand punches that almost KO fighters count just as much as slaps from your 12-year old sister.
Good takeHe was not winning the fight.
False.
He might have stole the first. The second round was competitive but I think Robbie began turning the tide.
Nick asked for a 5 rounder, and he didn't have 5 rounds of gas. Even if Nick was up on the cards (I'm not saying he was) it was a matter of time until he lost.
It was a great fight but the pace they were going at there was not going to be a need for judges. I'd be curious to see the cards, I was watching to enjoy it, not to score it.
Both guys ate a lot of shots, both guys also blocked and defended a lot of the shots so Im Curious how the judges scored that.
Anyone got a shot of the scorecards?
Robbie has made major improvements in his defense since the first fight. Nick caught him with his hands down and not rolling with the strike, that is damn near impossible to do to the grizzled veteran version of Robbie Lawler. Aside from Woodley, Robbie has done a great job of deflecting, rolling, and mitigating big shots in his second UFC run.
That must be one shitty legal counselNick's punches used to land with sickening thuds that would vibrate my shitty computer speakers. Literally none of his punches did that last night. There was one moment in particular he was shadowboxing lawyers face and it was weird
Oh come on it was one auto correct mistakeThat must be one shitty legal counsel
Just kidding around, ShermanoOh come on it was one auto correct mistake
Lol, throwing and landed a little more does not mean one won the fight. He wasn't gassed, he didn't want to fight anymore. Seriously, let it go and take it for what it is; Nick used to be a dog, fight to the death and he's not that guy anymore and that's fine.Js.
He was winning the fight, he just gassed. Maybe he learns his lesson on conditioning at this level and takes another big fight.
ThisIt doesnt matter.
Cant people just appreciate that we got a good ass fight from two great fighters who are clearly passed their best.
I was entertained for well over ten minutes by two old war-horses. Couldn't ask for more.It doesnt matter.
Cant people just appreciate that we got a good ass fight from two great fighters who are clearly passed their best.
Not if you're getting enough natural moisture and your watering is over saturation.You have a penchant for retarded posts. It's unbelievable.
You think a fight that lasted 3 rounds should have been scheduled for 3 rounds? WTF?
Stupid on two levels. One Nick Diaz has been doing ironman shit for years.
Two, you're telling me that an older guy who works out could be in better shape than a younger guy who doesn't?
No shit, Sherlock!
Hey, I've got a piece of knowledge that will blow your mind: If you water your lawn, the grass will be greener than if you don't.