Nick Diaz was supposed to be on TUF 4 that Matt Serra won
- Thread starter fm20000
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2013
- Messages
- 41,251
- Reaction score
- 30,785
That would have been insane. Nick would have been going straight up cuh-razay in the TUF house.
People would have gotten the taste Stockton Slapped clean out their mouths.
People would have gotten the taste Stockton Slapped clean out their mouths.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 938
- Reaction score
- 0
Yah, but he didn't. Also, who knows if he wins it all?? Matt Serra and Chris Lytle aren't superstars, but neither of those two are gonna be an easy fight.
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
- Messages
- 1,352
- Reaction score
- 26
Nicks roommates would've got crazy munchies and missed weight
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2014
- Messages
- 10,946
- Reaction score
- 0
Nick winning wouldn't of been a lock. Serra or Lytle could both possible beat him. Back then Nick was on a 3 fight losing streak to Riggs, Diego, and Sherk. Honestly Serra should have been a favorite.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2015
- Messages
- 4,773
- Reaction score
- 0
At that time I would prob favor serra.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 9,913
- Reaction score
- 2
He already beat Lytle, noob
Yes, THAT MEANS ALL FIGHTS WILL THEN FOREVER HAVE THE SAME RESULT!!!
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 9,913
- Reaction score
- 2
You said "would've"...indicating
an implied probability.
Well, if there is any probability to
be considered... it'd be that Diaz
had already beaten Lytle. Not the
other way around. Your assertion
is trash, is what I'm saying.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2013
- Messages
- 4,933
- Reaction score
- 0
Their fight was in 2002 and was a split decision.
Believing the fight could've gone the other way around 4 years later is not a stretch by any means.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 9,913
- Reaction score
- 2
I agree. It's why I "liked"
the third response to this thread.
There's just a way to word it.
The poster I replied to was being
a baby.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2013
- Messages
- 4,933
- Reaction score
- 0
Anyway I think Serra was a worse match-up for that version of Nick.I agree. It's why I "liked"
the third response to this thread.
There's just a way to word it.
The poster I replied to was being
a baby.
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 1,667
- Reaction score
- 92
Some tough matchups for Nick with Lytle, Thomas and Serra all in the house as well.
Would surely have made for some awesome TV without a doubt
Would surely have made for some awesome TV without a doubt
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 9,913
- Reaction score
- 2
Serra might get goaded into
a boxing match. I don't think it'd
end well for him. But Diaz gives
up a lot of takedowns, so who
knows. I think Lytle would've
been trouble. Jackson would've
been the clear threat to Diaz in
that season. Clementi would'nt
have been a pushover either,
but I think Diaz would've fucked
him up....
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2013
- Messages
- 4,933
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah, Serra was emotional at times, but if he went for takedowns he would win it, specially in a 2 rounds fight, Serra is very hard to sweep and the chance of Nick subbing him is very low.
I didn't remember Jackson being on that season at all.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 9,913
- Reaction score
- 2
He was sent home early.
I forgot he was on too until
I looked it up to make sure I
remembered correctly that
Clementi was on there.
No way, Serra doesn't have the TD's to where you'd think he'd be able to take Nick down over and over...and Nick had the advantage on the feet...even then. Serra rarely kicked. Nick was longer & bigger too.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
- Messages
- 316
- Reaction score
- 0
That's a cool quote. Makes sense you should have to earn it to prove your merit. Also Diaz wins that shit because that's what the UFC would have wanted
