Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by MXZT, Jul 30, 2021.
Between these two high profile brothers, who do you think is the better MMA fighter?
They both hate spinning shit too
common knowledge that its nick
Honestly I think it's Nate. He's consistently fought better competition.
I would say nicks better but mates made a better career out of it
I was posting to disagree, but, hard to. However, having GSP/Anderson/BJ/Condit/Gomi on your resume is hard to ignore.
Nick became champ and fought better competition
Without the conor fight.....nate would've been forgotten.
He beat a washed up Penn. Gomi was a great win. Lost to the other 3. Naming these 5 wasn't the best idea.
Like I said, consistently. Nate has had
and that's only from 2011-2016. Nick was pissing and moaning for most of that time, sitting on the sidelines.
I think they're about even, it's hard to say at this point.
Definitely Nick, Nate would say the same
Nate had by far the stronger schedule and picked up more top wins. I also think he's shown more on the ground than Nick. Obviously this a matter of perception, realistically I would imagine their skill level is probably very close
Nick. No disrespect to Nate, he is an excellent fighter.
Nate, made more $ thanks to the 2 Conor fights.
Nick. He and Nate are pretty much the same fighter except Nick is a bit better everywhere.
put them both in their prime in a fight at 170lbs and Nick would win.
with that said, Nate was just as good of a LW as nick was a WW, so I would say they're about the same at MMA as far as skill goes. Nick is just a bit stronger, and he has a bit more power in his hands.
I think Nick is the better fighter but Nate has consistently fought better competition
Both have the special skill that cannot be taught in a gym.
To never quit in a fight…….Probably learned in their youth
Separate names with a comma.