- Joined
- Oct 7, 2005
- Messages
- 24,982
- Reaction score
- 15,003
That was a K1 fight it doesn’t countAnd yet we have fighters who can show restraint.
That was a K1 fight it doesn’t countAnd yet we have fighters who can show restraint.
I think an ordinary person could kick someone in the head and it would do much less damage than an Ngnannou smesh. But these brutal finishes are the appeal. The fans ask for violence and Ngannou delivers. Nothing wrong with continuing until the referee intervenes because not doing so could cost you the fight if your opponent recovers.What's wrong with follow up shots?
Are they seen as brutal or unnecessary? Given the chance your opponent would do the same.
It's fighting business in relatively controlled enviroinment, they are far less damaging than kicking in the head, stomping, hitting with the bat or iron rod on the street as seen in Youtube videos.
I think an ordinary person could kick someone in the head and it would do much less damage than an Ngnannou smesh. But these brutal finishes are the appeal. The fans ask for violence and Ngannou delivers. Nothing wrong with continuing until the referee intervenes because not doing so could cost you the fight if your opponent recovers.
Ya I can't disagree with that. Maybe sometimes fighters do it just to add some violence to their victory. I mean it probably makes fans more interested in watching when the fighter is a brutal finisher so it's in the fighters interest to make their finishes as violent as possible. Fighters who don't throw unnecessary follow up shots do get commended for their sportsmanship but I don't think fighters who do should get too much criticism.If your opponent is slumped down like a dead man, chances are they aren't recovering anytime soon. I'm not saying it's never justified, but sometimes it's really obvious a man is completely out. Especially when you just connected with a brutal punch and have the power of Ngannou.
Ya I can't disagree with that. Maybe sometimes fighters do it just to add some violence to their victory. I mean it probably makes fans more interested in watching when the fighter is a brutal finisher so it's in the fighters interest to make their finishes as violent as possible. Fighters who don't throw unnecessary follow up shots do get commended for their sportsmanship but I don't think fighters who do should get too much criticism.
For me, I see it as a severe sign of a lack of confidence. Guys who usually land shots, after the fact, are guys who are "just happy to be there" because fear/doubt kept them from believing they would actually be there. If you were confident in yourself and "expected" the result, restraint would be much be easier to exercise.
I wouldn't normally guess that Ngannou was afraid or full of self doubt but he did not help his case with the Lewis fight.
And Werdum, who was out cold.How many follow up shots did Stipe land to DC and Overeem?