- Joined
- Aug 18, 2010
- Messages
- 37,262
- Reaction score
- 1,355
I hate the pats but the the amount of butt hurt over psi in a football is fiucking hilarious
I agree, but if it's no big deal why go through all that to hide it....
I hate the pats but the the amount of butt hurt over psi in a football is fiucking hilarious
Some people actually still think OJ murdered two people even after found innocent for murder.
Yeah, I'm not searching for the giant log between those two assistants just to show you that they very clearly allude to Brady's instruction to deflate balls, whether to an illegal extent or not. You can take that as a win for all I care.
Also, regarding your "it's scientifically proven" assertion (which I'm fairly sure has been debunked), it's my mistake for having forgotten that the Colts were traveling down to Miami for their offensive drives, whereas the Pats were staying put in Boston.
Random reality shifts are crazy, huh.
As a Packers fan what do you think of Rodgers overinflating the balls outside regulation rules?
Does your chart take into account the PSI difference that is accounted for by the near 15 minutes after the Pats balls were tested the Colts balls were warming up before they were tested?
I'd bring up the Aaron Rodgers quote but that's so trivial in this matter.
I think the footballs should be under lock and key. Only the NFL handles the football. Not any equipment people. Strictly NFL.
Did the NFL ever actually produce logs of pregame logs of psi? It seemed like they never actually documented it, just provided assertions that it was done according to standard.
Rodgers flat out says it's an advantage for him, so your belief is meaningless and you are simply being a hypocrite in this situation. If overinflation is a benefit to QB A, and underinflation is beneficial to QB B, then QB A using overinflated balls is equally bad to QB B using underinflated balls.I think if it were caught in game and balls were shown to be demonstrably different, I'd favor Rodgers being punished as well. However, I don't think over-inflation has the same collateral benefits as under-inflation does, namely the ability to grip the ball and sustain blows to it with less bouncing. If there's a philosophical problem I have with under-inflation, it's more with ball-handling than with anything relating to Brady's throws.
They tested the Pats balls right away, when they were still cold. They then adjusted the Pats balls. AFTER spending the entire halftime on the pats balls, they tested the Colts balls. They only had time to test 4 balls before they ran out of time. This means the Colts balls were inside warming up. It's a scientific fact that has a HUGE impact on PSI readings. I believe it was a minimum of 5-7 minutes the Colts balls had to warm up, the exact time they had to warm up is unknown.Rephrase.
http://www.backpicks.com/2015/05/22/the-statistical-improbability-of-deflate-gate/If we take the mean of all six hypothetical scenarios, the average Patriot ball is about 0.003 PSI below where it should be at the time of measurement relative to the Colt balls.
I agree, but if it's no big deal why go through all that to hide it....
NFL files an appeal of Deflategate decision that erased Tom Brady suspension
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...chard-overturned-berman-new-england/71504142/
The deflator comment was made in the beginning of May 2014. We know Brady liked his footballs on the lower end of the PSI spectrum, so it is likely that the equipment managers deflated balls sometimes or quite often.
When did Brady ever indicate that he liked the footballs deflated below the allowed limit?
Forgot that you posted this shit on the same page huh...?