- Joined
- Jul 5, 2008
- Messages
- 93,959
- Reaction score
- 21,590
If they tied they were going to Arrowhead where they have no shot lol
Theyre live against Zac Taylor TBH
Biasicca is a genius lol
If they tied they were going to Arrowhead where they have no shot lol
Theyre live against Zac Taylor TBH
I listen to NY Hip Hop and don’t call my friends “slatt”You're probably not as big a fan of country music as Derek Carr is.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/04...ed-carpet-at-academy-of-country-music-awards/
My slime.I listen to NY Hip Hop and don’t call my friends “slatt”
i know what i posted. thanks for your dog shit commentary though. you can go to bed now.
Heading there now, dumbass.
Yes that's what i'm talking about. 2 seconds on the playclock, not gameclock (gameclock was around 40).No one confused about the raiders timeout. It was the chargers timeout with 40 seconds. The chargers call the TO and their goal was to run down the clock.
Chargers subreddit is in shambles
No. Big fan of Burrow. Im saying hitting a QB can shut their game down. Dont want the kid getting hurt.That's fucked , you're going to put some Carson Palmer torn acl in his first playoff game voodoo on the kid
That same formation the next play got them a first down so whose to say that "run that would of run down the clock" wouldn't of gotten a first down the first time ?Because they were going to run that play and let the clock run out and gift the Chargers a tie , when the time out happened they said fuck it , we will kick it.
No. Big fan of Burrow. Im saying hitting a QB can shut their game down. Dont want the kid getting hurt.
Not understanding the controversy with the timeout.
He called a timeout with 2 seconds left on the playclock and Oakland was lined up to run the ball to the left.
Timeout happens and Oakland lines up again and runs to the left and gets a first down. Why would a non-timeout of changed that ?
Oakland was literally about to run the exact same play they ran after the timeout that got them the first down.Raiders were about to run out the clock. Literally just about the only way the Chargers missed the playoffs was if he called the TO. I don't even see how it thought it would help the Chargers at all. It made zero fuckin sense any way you look at it.
That same formation the next play got them a first down so whose to say that "run that would of run down the clock" wouldn't of gotten a first down the first time ?
Seemed like the real issue was just the Chargers not stopping a telegraphed run on 3rd on short more so then "oh he called a timeout"
Here's the play, exact same play aftter the timeout (I think he called timeout because #25 didn't roll over to the slot so the guy was wide open)
Oakland was literally about to run the exact same play they ran after the timeout that got them the first down.
Where is this conspiracy that Oakland wasn't planning on running a legitmate play ? It was literally the exact same play they ran to get the first down