Did the production of Chlorofluorocarbons for commercial use only really get going in the late 30's, basically at the end of the first spike in temps?The reason for the difference between actual and expected warming earlier in the century was due to the cooling effect of other pollutants, particularly CFC's, which were banned under the Montreal Protocol in the 80's--hence increased warming after that. They were mitigating the warming effect (while doing massive damage to the ozone layer.) Of course, this never gets mentioned by the crowd trying to discredit climate science.
Sadly, there has been recent evidence someone is disregarding the ban and putting CFC's into the atmosphere again.
Let me know if you young'uns need to be filled in on any other stuff from "back in the day"
Partially this.Plant more fucking trees.
Moose are making carbon monoxide eh?Human-made climat change is real but not as drastic as environmentalists claim. To this day the main source of CO (and other "greenhouse" gases like methane) emissions in Northern Europe are farting mooses. Think about it.
Pollution, on the other hand, is very real and should be battled globally.
What do you mean by 'Nothern Europe'? If you mean Scadinavia - you might\ be correct - but that's only because Scandinavia is fucking balling it when it comes to renewables - geothermal, hydro, wind left right and centre.Human-made climat change is real but not as drastic as environmentalists claim. To this day the main source of CO (and other "greenhouse" gases like methane) emissions in Northern Europe are farting mooses. Think about it.
Pollution, on the other hand, is very real and should be battled globally.
TS is going to look really bad in this thread...
Great question---the most cursory of google searches tells us,Did the production of Chlorofluorocarbons for commercial use only really get going in the late 30's, basically at the end of the first spike in temps?
You won't get many takers playing upon empathy around here.I'm pretty fed up with the pathetic arguments back and forth.
Seriously - ask yourselves:
Basically - are you onboard that the world is warming up? If not - forget science - go ask your grandparents their experiences. Mine used to iceskate on lakes in winter. Me - those lakes don't even exist anymore, let alone freeze.
Do you also concur that it's happening at a fucking (quote goldie here) meteoric rate - because it is - we are DEFINITELY seeing global temperature changes happening within 100 years (that to EVERYTHING we can measure) would normally take 10,000 years to happen.
Whether it's humans or not (BTW - it's humans) - if it carries on at this rate - (combined with cutting down all the trees) - large parts of the developing world will suffer within our life-times.
Forget sea-rises, forget the tempuratures being unseasonably pleasent in the spring - what do you think happens when 100M indians (just an example) no longer have water or a place to live (just Google 'Chennai') - or any of the other developing countries. Who cares about the 'brown people' right?
No more cheap labour. No more cheap products. No more cheap anything. 100M people migrating to the nearest countries?
That's a recipe for global recession if i ever heard one - and maybe worse.
You look bad in every thread you post in, perhaps you should take your own advice....TS is going to look really bad in this thread... Maybe ask a mod to delete it and save yourself the embarrassment
Thomas Midgley Jr's patent that year. It wasn't commercially used until the late 30's . Even if it had been heavily used from 1928 (It wasn't), then the warming was already almost two thirds in play (1910-40).Great question---the most cursory of google searches tells us,
"1928: Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were invented."
Paul isn’t Finnish, nor does he publish papers, you fucking moronPublished by Paul Joseph Watson
Paul Joseph Watson is an English YouTube personality, radio host, writer and conspiracy theorist. He has been described as 'alt-right' by multiple sources. Although as late as July 2016 he called himself alt-right, he no longer accepts that label and considers himself part of the "New Right."
Sounds legit
Paul isn’t Finnish, nor does he publish papers, you fucking moron
CFC's were undoubtedly a causal factor. Whether or not other factors were at play, I am not making any claims either way--I'm no expert-- no doubt there could be contributions from things like solar output variation.Thomas Midgley Jr's patent that year. It wasn't commercially used until the late 30's . Even if it had been heavily used from 1928 (It wasn't), then the warming was already almost two thirds in play (1910-40).
I'm pretty fed up with the pathetic arguments back and forth.
Seriously - ask yourselves:
Basically - are you onboard that the world is warming up? If not - forget science - go ask your grandparents their experiences. Mine used to iceskate on lakes in winter. Me - those lakes don't even exist anymore, let alone freeze.
Do you also concur that it's happening at a fucking (quote goldie here) meteoric rate - because it is - we are DEFINITELY seeing global temperature changes happening within 100 years (that to EVERYTHING we can measure) would normally take 10,000 years to happen.
Whether it's humans or not (BTW - it's humans) - if it carries on at this rate - (combined with cutting down all the trees) - large parts of the developing world will suffer within our life-times.
Forget sea-rises, forget the tempuratures being unseasonably pleasent in the spring - what do you think happens when 100M indians (just an example) no longer have water or a place to live (just Google 'Chennai') - or any of the other developing countries. Who cares about the 'brown people' right?
No more cheap labour. No more cheap products. No more cheap anything. 100M people migrating to the nearest countries?
That's a recipe for global recession if i ever heard one - and maybe worse.
As long as the trees aren't cut down again. A real forest needs a lot of time to grow.Plant more fucking trees.
Climate change, more specifically drought brought by years of mismanagement of the Syrian country side, was a big factor in the Syrian civil war too.I'm pretty fed up with the pathetic arguments back and forth.
Seriously - ask yourselves:
Basically - are you onboard that the world is warming up? If not - forget science - go ask your grandparents their experiences. Mine used to iceskate on lakes in winter. Me - those lakes don't even exist anymore, let alone freeze.
Do you also concur that it's happening at a fucking (quote goldie here) meteoric rate - because it is - we are DEFINITELY seeing global temperature changes happening within 100 years (that to EVERYTHING we can measure) would normally take 10,000 years to happen.
Whether it's humans or not (BTW - it's humans) - if it carries on at this rate - (combined with cutting down all the trees) - large parts of the developing world will suffer within our life-times.
Forget sea-rises, forget the tempuratures being unseasonably pleasent in the spring - what do you think happens when 100M indians (just an example) no longer have water or a place to live (just Google 'Chennai') - or any of the other developing countries. Who cares about the 'brown people' right?
No more cheap labour. No more cheap products. No more cheap anything. 100M people migrating to the nearest countries?
That's a recipe for global recession if i ever heard one - and maybe worse.
CFC's were undoubtedly a causal factor. Whether or not other factors were at play, I am not making any claims either way--I'm no expert-- no doubt there could be contributions from things like solar output variation.