- Joined
- Mar 12, 2010
- Messages
- 2,516
- Reaction score
- 0
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/1/7/7510525/nevada-deputy-attorney-general-reviewing-whether-or-not-jon-jones
"See, Jones was under oath in front of the NSAC while discussing the brawl and, as part of his attempt to keep the commission from being too harsh with their punishments, said that he had lost the Nike deal because of the brawl. He cited that as part of the money he had already lost because of his actions.
Jones has recently said that he "worded it wrong" in front of the commission and actually meant that he lost a few months in revenue checks and didn't get to use his Nike account credit. At the time of the hearing, Jones' attorney pointed out that the deal they lost was in the six figures every year. So, it would seem at least a little deceptive in the wording if they weren't actually trying to say that the brawl cost him that money.
."
When it rains it pours for this guy.
Sorry if it's already been posted. I haven't seen it.
"See, Jones was under oath in front of the NSAC while discussing the brawl and, as part of his attempt to keep the commission from being too harsh with their punishments, said that he had lost the Nike deal because of the brawl. He cited that as part of the money he had already lost because of his actions.
Jones has recently said that he "worded it wrong" in front of the commission and actually meant that he lost a few months in revenue checks and didn't get to use his Nike account credit. At the time of the hearing, Jones' attorney pointed out that the deal they lost was in the six figures every year. So, it would seem at least a little deceptive in the wording if they weren't actually trying to say that the brawl cost him that money.
."
When it rains it pours for this guy.
Sorry if it's already been posted. I haven't seen it.