- Joined
- Apr 26, 2016
- Messages
- 9,278
- Reaction score
- 0
Honestly I would not want to be stationed on that ship. Becuase it didn't turn out well for Sodom and Gomorrah.
But san francisco and hollywood are doing quite well
Honestly I would not want to be stationed on that ship. Becuase it didn't turn out well for Sodom and Gomorrah.
Oh well that's ok then....nothing to see here folks....
Lol. For how long?But san francisco and hollywood are doing quite well
Anyone who uses the Legality as justification is a turd...and that goes for anyone who says "but 16 is legal", these same perverted pieces of shit are basically admitting that they are being held back by the law...these same scumbags would bang 14 year olds 'if it was legal"..fuck all that. This guy deserved a kick in the nutsThis is a separate topic in of itself but I don't understand the why any conservative, who by definition are for states rights, would expect the federal government to take issue with something that is not in violation of federal laws. When some states had 18 years old drinking laws, it was a violation of federal guidelines and DoT money was without from these states until they fell in line. Weed shops are legal in several states but are in violation of federal law and were up until recently I think being busted by federal agencies. To ask the president to praise or condemn a states actions that fall within federal boundaries leads to an encroachment of state's rights.
No, indeed, there really isn't.Oh well that's ok then....nothing to see here folks....
Nope..nothing wrong with a 33 year old man buggering a boy..it's a beautiful thing...just like the relationships our parents had. Look, this isn't about him being gay, its about his borderline paedophilic behaviour. He shouldn't be celebrated, and definitely not to this extentNo, indeed, there really isn't.
Holy shit! I laughed out loud. I'm in tears, brah!Side note.
This class of ship are Fleet Replenishment Oilers. So it will literally be filled with lube and seamen.
No, indeed, there really isn't.
Is this any more embarrassing than naming a library after former president Bush.
The irony is astounding
Which one? Both Presidents Bush have libraries named after them. So does the adulterer, Bill Clinton.
Yes, naming a U.S military ship after a guy who buggers teenage boys...Is this any more embarrassing than naming a library after former president Bush.
The irony is astounding
Well Clinton was at least intellectual when he spoke. Bush Jr. was anything but an intellectual speaker.
There is no Bush Jr.
41 was George Herbert Walker Bush. 43 was George Walker Bush; not a Jr.
If you're going to critique intellect, please be smart about it.
Yes, naming a U.S military ship after a guy who buggers teenage boys...
Yes, naming a U.S military ship after a guy who buggers teenage boys...
Yeah, i do...and?, am i supposed to be "not allowed" to speak about America, just because i'm not from there?, funny, i saw plenty of Americans talking in the threads about the UK, Germany, France, Iraq, and on and on...? This is the World Wide Web, and i love 'Murica, almost as much as my own nation. I'm glad just to have the ability to listen to patriots, and scorn unpatriotic shit heads. It's great to be honest!Don't you live in another country? What do you even care
Plenty of other nations, actually...Sounds about right, who takes advantage of America's vulnerable young men more than the Armed Forces?