- Joined
- Oct 7, 2009
- Messages
- 2,890
- Reaction score
- 0
Nate Diaz?Lance Armstrong
Nate Diaz?Lance Armstrong
How dare you talk sense when it doesn't fit into the narrative.Let me be honest with you, I'm a type-1 diabetic, I took subcutaneous insulin shots every single day for the last 25 years, just today I took 2.
The most comfortable place to take subcutaneous shots is at the leg, which gets covered by the trunks, and also it won't leave any visible scar, otherwise I'd be full of it.
I'm not sure what were you guys talking about, I don't want to join the discussion, but I can guarantee you that if someone were just a little bit concerned about hiding stuff they would inject themselves on the best and at same time most comfortable way there is: The leg.
That's the kind of argument we expect from a McGregor fan lolYou know what's awesome?? EVERYONE talks about GSP.
I still can’t believe people use the line “he’s never tested positive”. It’s so trite. So many doping scandals involve people that have never tested positive.
i know the freaking mcgregor fans r lucky cuz it seems any fucking talk or publicity for their man is good regardless. he fucking assaulted a bus full of fighters and still theres talk about his next fight as if nothing ever happened. but oh well i guess man people like wtf they like. sure i love gsp but im not basing these steroid allegations off of pure bias.. i mean it is an actual fact that he hasnt tested positive for anything. has he ever taken something? i dunno, maybe maybe not, but im not gonna say " he most certainly is on something" without actually knowing like other morons on here do.That's the kind of argument we expect from a McGregor fan lol
In most of the civilized countries I've been to, it's innocent until proven guilty. No? The proof is 100% on GSPs side. He's never tested positive for anything. And he's (probably) the #1 advocate for more and stricter testing, and has been for a long time. I can add 1+1 and come up with 2. Most shertards want to add 1+1 and have it come out to 3........
I never said it wasn't banned. I said it isn't a PED. Which it isn't.
Re read the original post you quoted, then get back to me.
read this , I believe it is considered a PEDPEDs
Look at my post again. Then try again.
read this , I believe it is considered a PED
http://www.popsci.com.au/science/me...considered-a-performanceenhancing-drug,378158
I still can’t believe people use the line “he’s never tested positive”. It’s so trite. So many doping scandals involve people that have never tested positive.
Gsp has tested positive the exact same amount of times for PEDs as the Diaz Bros.
FACT
Nate Diaz Accuses GSP of Steroid Abuse
Well this is not a court of law, and there’s no punishment at stake besides public opinion so you really can’t claim anyone is being unjust when they accuse GSP of steroid use.
How dare you talk sense when it doesn't fit into the narrative.
Yup is right we just cannot deny it, ok well we have no proof, and it’s just our dope hazed rambling ideas, you know here say and speculative opinion, kinda pulled it from our bag of excuses, because we could have been great but we smoked our talent away and never fulfilled our true potential as our lack of emotional maturity would not let us evolve, so let’s here all the Gangsta Twitter callout excuse rolledex hype, yup can confirm it’s GSP fault, stay classy homie.GSP is a known cheater, nate is right
Things we know:
A) Over the weight limit against Nick
B) Greasing against BJ
C) Most "explosive" White man in the history of the sport (arguably)
Things Nate is suggesting:
D) Steroids
E) Drugging Nick
Somebody is gonna have to explain to me what makes D and E so far-fetched, when we know A, B and C to be true.
Well this is not a court of law, and there’s no punishment at stake besides public opinion so you really can’t claim anyone is being unjust when they accuse GSP of steroid use.