I posted this at the ail nend of the other thread but is is now locked. So I'll repost for WB to see and respond to re: Bisping/Stann:
Here's the thing WB, I think Stann is a mediocre fighter. I like Stann as a person, but as a fighter, he is B level at best. I mean, he's not quick, he's stiff as fuck, and he gets by almost exclusively on power.
Let's be realistic here; who has Stann ever beaten to be considered a good win? Chris Leben? GTFO! Leben is even a worse version of Stann than Stann. Who else? Jorge Santiago? FFS Jorge has two trips to the UFC and all he has to show for it is a measly win over Justin Levens. I mean, it's like Jorge crumbles against anyone he faces in the Octagon, like he's allergic to an 8 sided cage or something. Who else? Alessio Sakara? We know that's a joke. The rest of Stann's wins aren't even worth mentioning for forum fodder.
Point is, I wouldn't take anything from Bisping's win over Stann. That win was predicated by the td and we know Stann couldn't stuff a td if life depended on. In fact, Stann couldn't stop a takedown if Specialist Charles Graner instructed Lynndie England to take Lieutenant Stann to the floor of Abu Ghraib prison and demonstrate to the Iraqi detainees what the word sodomy means.
Vitor is on a far different plane that Stann IMHO. He's quicker, his boxing is light-years ahead of Stann's, he can sprawl, he has jits, he can wrestle, etc. etc, Like Wandy, Vitor will give Bisping much more to think about than some robotic-esque boxing and power punches.