1. The official Sherdog Store is back! Check it out! » Discuss it here! »

My UFC on FX 7 Bets (and Others) - Post Yours! (Part II)

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Oblivian, Jan 11, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Oblivian Aging Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    41,935
    Likes Received:
    390
    Location:
    Merica
    Part 1 of the thread is here: http://www.sherdog.net/forums/f2/my-ufc-fx-7-bets-others-post-yours-2344839/

    Same drill as always. Post bets and discuss bets/matchups. Thread is always bumped afterwards.

    I've got some early plays going. I'll probably only play around $100-$150. I'm not really liking this card too much overall.

    Singles
    Gonzaga: $12.50 to win $16.88
    Khabib: $12.50 to win $7.35
    Petruzelli: $12.50 to win $7.58
    Freire: $7.50 to win $7.50
    Payan: $7.50 to win $5.77
    Dolloway: $5 to win $7.50
    Saffiedine: $5 to win $12.50
    Anthony Smith: $5 to win $12.50
    Saff/Marquardt doesn't go 5: $5 to win $8.25
    Chandler/Hawn: $5 to win $6
    Kyle: $2.50 to win $8
    Herman: $2.50 to win $7.50

    Parlays
    Klitschko + Cruz + Cleverly + Froch + Price + Bisping: $12.50 to win $20.97
    Barnett + Noons: $12.50 to win $7.85
    Healy + Kennedy + Cormier + Barnett: $10 to win $6.95
    Colts (over Chiefs) + Hawn: $5 to win $13.07
    Field over T. Clark (golf) + Caballero (box) + Hernandez (box) + Perez (box) + Cormier + Barnett + Healy + Kennedy + Not Belfort Dec: $5 to win $6.96
    Barcelona/Malaga neither team 4 goals + Newton: $5 to win $6
    Field over Stricker (golf) + Gavin (boxing) + Cormier + Gonzaga/Rothwell ITD + Not Belfort by Dec: $5 to win $5.51
    Marquardt/Saff starts 2nd + Barnett ITD + Kyle/Mousasi ITD: $5 to win $5.04
    Field over Kuchar (golf) + Gurgel: $2.50 to win $7.95
    Zayats + Newton: $2.50 to win $8.69
    Nunes + Baszler + Dolloway: $2.50 to win $12.35


    TOTALS FOR 2012: Initial Risk was $275, Running Total is $1030.18 Running Profit = $755.18 (Approximate ROI for year: 15.56%)
    TOTALS FOR 2011: Initial Risk was $44, Running Total $1271.39 Running Profit = $1227.39 (Approximate ROI for year: 27%)
    TOTALS FOR 2010: Initial Risk was $29, Running Total $225.92 Running Profit = $196.92 (Approximate ROI for year: 13%)
    GRAND TOTAL FOR 2010 THROUGH 2012: $29 into $2205.80 Total Profit = $2176.80 (Approximate ROI: 20.5%)
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
  2. electricute Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2012
    Messages:
    1,822
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto
    O, how do u choose which event goes into which parlay? and how do u choose how long to make your parlays.

    some of them seem so random
     
  3. phoenixikki Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,703
    Likes Received:
    5,504
    [​IMG]
     
  4. EzFlyer Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    37,934
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    philly
    Strike 1/12 Risk: 790
    Saffiedine +240: 100 for 240 // Marquardt
    Cormier-Staring: U1.5: 68 for 40
    Barnett-Guelmino: U1.5: 72 for 40
    Kyle +350: 100 for 350 // Mousasi
    Jacare-Herman
    Healy-Holobaugh
    A. Smith +260: 100 for 260 // Gracie
    Kennedy-Smith
    Noons -175: 350 for 200 // Couture
    Gurgel-Martins
    Bravo-Payan

    so far.
     
  5. Oblivian Aging Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    41,935
    Likes Received:
    390
    Location:
    Merica
    I'm not really sure what you are asking. Can you rephrase?
     
  6. Oblivian Aging Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    41,935
    Likes Received:
    390
    Location:
    Merica
    Do tell.
     
  7. cs10 Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    Messages:
    619
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto
    lol damn wasnt paying attention and accidentally bet 100 on lentz at even money, i was considering betting him as a dog but didnt want this lol ah well
     
  8. Kaffe Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2011
    Messages:
    2,783
    Likes Received:
    10
    My bets:

    Strikeforce

    7.5 on Noons to win 3.95
    5 on A. Smith to win 13
    5 on Gurgel to win 11.75
    5 on Saffiedine to win 12
    5 on Jacare to win 1.25
    0.5 on Staring to win 6

    UFC

    10 on Dollaway to win 15.8
    10 on Bisping to win 10.5
    7.5 on Gonzaga to win 6
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2013
  9. electricute Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2012
    Messages:
    1,822
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto
    i'm not even sure anymore. disregard
     
  10. Oblivian Aging Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    41,935
    Likes Received:
    390
    Location:
    Merica
    I wasn't sure if you meant what event that I show them in or the thought process in making the longer parlays. Ever since the CigsandMath ordeal, I've been posting every bet that I make. I don't put them in the OP until the final event of the parlay, but any losses will be displayed and incurred on the event that has the loss. For example, I only have one play that involves futures on this event that I posted in Part I of this thread "Kennedy + Healy + Barnette + Cormier + Overeem + Rashad + Faber + Rousey + GSP: $5 to win $16.71". If any of those lose, I'll incur the loss on this event's total and add it to the OP. I thought about showing all futures and such in every thread OP, but it would be way too large. I currently have 34 bets pending.

    If you are asking about the actual bets, a lot are just out of boredom or just to have action on things I watch. You'll see I rarely bet football besides the Colts since I'd watch them. I do watch golf events and often put a play on that for the action. I bet boxing squash matches a lot too. I figure I'll get burned sometime on that, but I haven't yet. So yes, a lot of it is pretty random on those longer $5 parlays.
     
  11. IamJames Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    Saffiedine is a square bet, he has no way to really win. I think that's kind of the pitfall of a lot of sharp betters, they see a fight potentially being pretty competitive and bet on the moderate underdog, but Saff doesn't have anything that Marquardt can outdo him in or completely neutralize.
     
  12. arrelione Red Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Messages:
    8,745
    Likes Received:
    6
    Even money on Lentz/Nunes? What site is this on? I'll drop some $$$ on Diego at even.
     
  13. Oblivian Aging Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    41,935
    Likes Received:
    390
    Location:
    Merica
    I'm guessing you are the same James on SBR that said Marquardt is a lock and you are giving him a 95% chance?
     
  14. IamJames Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bingo
     
  15. Oblivian Aging Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    41,935
    Likes Received:
    390
    Location:
    Merica
    I don't really have any issue with your logic on the stylistic matchup (although I don't necessarily agree), but I do think you are way off on your %.
     
  16. EzFlyer Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    37,934
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    philly
    his 95% is waaaaay off.

    95 % means if you get marquardt at -900, it's a good bet. if you truly believe 95%, you're *crazy* not to bet a crapload on -300.

    people don't know what they're saying when they rattle off %'s though. especially those who don't bet.
     
  17. IamJames Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    My biggest bet yet is on Marquardt. If Tarec finds a miracle to win, he crushes me completely.
     
  18. EzFlyer Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    37,934
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    philly
    well, your money is where your mouth is. fair enough
     
  19. EzFlyer Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    37,934
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    philly
    i don't see how you can say 95%, i just don't. marq is mainly a finisher, and tarec's never been finished. tarec has crisper standup than nate. tarec isn't terrible anywhere. marquardt has bad standup D quite often. nate also has fought with sub par gameplans a couple times.

    95 % is just off
     
  20. UAK Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,583
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Stockholm, Sweden.
    95% = -2000.

    -300 = zomg value ( 26% Expected ROI with your probability estimate ). According to kelly you should almost bet 80% of your bankroll to maximize EV.

    You're either exaggerating, clueless OR you are an extremely confident bettor ( like most sherdoggers but they never put their money where their mouth is so who cares about them )

    Edit: Most likely -> confident & delusional
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.