Mueller's Patton the back (investigation thread v. 22)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quequeg said:
It is in a New Yorker profile.
Click to expand...
A New Yorker profile written by the guy who claimed on live television that criticizing Antifa is racist because Antifa is a mostly black organization.
 
andnowweknow said:
So Bob Mueller lives in an alternate reality. But not you. Got it.
Click to expand...
Are you sure that Mueller is investigating Trump for obstruction of justice? Do you have any non-anonymous sources for that?
 
Quequeg said:
The senile drunk Rudy said a rebuttal is being prepared, let me get this strait, they are gonna rebut a report that hey don't know the contents of?
Click to expand...
Rudy is Cape Fearing Trump.
Trump should have gave him the AG spot instead of Sessions. Rudy demanded tribute for being early on the Trump Train.
No Rudy is slowing putting together the worst defense I have ever seen to stick it to Trump for not making him AG.
I doubt any real attorney would be that stupid unless he secretly wanted to fuck his client.
 
waiguoren said:
Really? No one? How about the Justice Department, which was attempting to prosecute Edwards for campaign finance violations and conspiracy to direct others to make illegal campaign contributions? It's clear you haven't read the indictment against Edwards, which is available here.



COUNT THREE
2 U.S.C. § 441a
(Illegal Campaign Contributions)

36. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through
12 and paragraphs 15 through 33 of this Indictment are
incorporated here.

37. During the calendar year 2 008, in the Middle
District of North Carolina and elsewhere, the defendant,
JOHNNY REID EDWARDS, while a candidate for federal office,
knowingly and willfully accepted and received contributions from
Person C in excess of the limits of the Election Act, which
aggregated $25,000 and more, and did aid and abet said offense.


COUNT FOUR
2 U.S.C. § 441a
(Illegal Campaign Contributions)

38. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through
12 and paragraphs 15 through 33 of this Indictment are
incorporated here.

39. During the calendar year 2007, in the Middle
District of North Carolina and elsewhere, the defendant,
JOHNNY REID EDWARDS, while a candidate for federal office,
knowingly and willfully accepted and received contributions from
Person D in excess of the limits of the Election Act, which
aggregated $25,000 and more, and did aid and abet said offense.


COUNT FIVE
2 U.S.C. § 441a
(Illegal Campaign Contributions)

40. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through
12 and paragraphs 15 through 33 of this Indictment are
incorporated here.

41. During the calendar year 2008, in the Middle
District of North Carolina and elsewhere, the defendant,
JOHNNY REID EDWARDS, while a candidate for federal office,
knowingly and willfully accepted and received contributions from
Person D in excess of the limits of the Election Act, which
aggregated $25,000 and more, and did aid and abet said offense.
Click to expand...
What matters is evidenced presented . Evidence was overwhemling in favor of of acquittal. Government didn't meet their burden of proof. They had no star witness.

Meanwhile in the criminal conspiracy cohen and tRUmp had the government has a star witness, it's called the money trail laid out in the indictment
 
waiguoren said:
Are you sure that Mueller is investigating Trump for obstruction of justice? Do you have any non-anonymous sources for that?
Click to expand...
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/01/poli...ald-trump-robert-mueller-interview/index.html


Right from Rudys mouth. They want to ask about obstruction . This indicates they've already interviewed other witnesses and now want to secure an interview with the subject of the investigation.

I know your gas lighting takes a lot of effort so I won't dock you for not keeping up.
 
waiguoren said:
The two cases are very similar.
Click to expand...
No matter how much you say this doesn't make it true .

1) Melania isn't dying

2) Edwards married only once

3) Cohen gave investigators at least a paper trail maybe more

4) Government had no star witness to go to rebutt multiple witnesses who said Edwards was doing this to hide from wife

5) Government has Cohen deputy finance chair of RNC with a paper trail. If something like that went to trial it would be hard to create reasonable doubt as a defense attorney

These cases are only similar in the alleged offense . That's where similarities stop
 
Bobby 3 Sticks said:
Right from Rudys mouth. They want to ask about obstruction . This indicates they've already interviewed other witnesses and now want to secure an interview with the subject of the investigation.
Click to expand...

Again, you've offered no source showing that Mueller is seeking obstruction of justice charges against Trump. Giuliani attempting to insulate Trump against obstruction-related questions is not the same thing. Read more carefully.
 
waiguoren said:
Again, you've offered no source showing that Mueller is seeking obstruction of justice charges against Trump. Giuliani attempting to insulate Trump against obstruction-related questions is not the same thing. Read more carefully.
Click to expand...
When your lawyer is saying the government wants to ask obstruction of justice questions and the defense lawyer doesn't want those questions asked, the government is investigating you for obstruction of justice. How much more plain does it have to be?

Then again you're one of those people where Mueller could release a report saying tRUmp obstructed and you would say tRUmp didn't .

You'd make a terrible lawyer worse than even Cohen
 
Bobby 3 Sticks said:
1) Melania isn't dying

2) Edwards married only once

3) Cohen gave investigators at least a paper trail maybe more

4) Government had no star witness to go to rebutt multiple witnesses who said Edwards was doing this to hide from wife

5) Government has Cohen deputy finance chair of RNC with a paper trail. If something like that went to trial it would be hard to create reasonable doubt as a defense attorney
Click to expand...

This is a good response from the standpoint of legal analysis. Well done.
 
Bobby 3 Sticks said:
When your lawyer is saying the government wants to ask obstruction of justice questions and the defense lawyer doesn't want those questions asked, the government is investigating you for obstruction of justice. How much more plain does it have to be?
Click to expand...

That's just wrong. The defense attorney's job is to anticipate the prosecutor's lines of attack. He is negotiating the terms of a potential interview and attempting to pre-empt a potential obstruction of justice investigation.
 
tonni said:
That's specifically what Rudy's and Rudy's pills are trying to prevent.
Click to expand...
You take the Rudy pill—the investigation ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the Mueller pill—you stay in Wonderland, and he shows us how deep the bullshit goes.
 
Once again I'm gonna post this


On Friday a top trump lobbyist admitted in court he lied to congress, the FBI and helped funnel ILLEGAL Ukranian money into the trump campaign via a Russian national.

Let's not forget this people

Unfortunately it happened on a Friday before the holiday weekend making it almost unimportant.
 
tonni said:
2eee322cf3074ce6a00c7382d82d0033
Click to expand...
Wow so fitting knowing what was on the tape. Whoever made this is a real pro.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,701
Messages
55,435,929
Members
174,774
Latest member
kilgorevontrouty

Share this page

Back
Top