- Joined
- Mar 23, 2020
- Messages
- 18,099
- Reaction score
- 18,136
the Hermeneutics of the passages seem pretty straight forward. Scholars disagree on a philosophical level because it’s a hard pill to swallow- do we say that if you’ve never had the opportunity to hear the good word that you’re off the hook in regards to hell? If that was true then it means you’re actually damning people to hell by giving them the opportunity to reject the message (IE: 100 tribesman don’t know about Jesus so 100 tribesmen get into heaven. If you tell all 100 about god and only 50 accept him then 50 go to hell). Then again you could argue that anyone who goes to hell was supposed to in order to show the world how great and merciful god is (Romans 8 goes into this). According to Paul (and many learned folks interpretation of his book) that is exactly what is happening. God creates and sends some to hell without them ever having an opportunity at redemption.
it just never sat right with me.
The language of the text is not clear at all... you are wrong. The language used for hell is diverse with many different meanings and there is no way to draw clear conclusion from the New Testament itself unless you go by newer translations that translate the many different words and meanings into the one word hell.
We know for a fact there was no clear understanding of the hell that Jesus spoke of by the fact that all the disciples used different words meaning different things along with the fact that the early church fathers, the great saints and intellects of the early church who are both holy and educated had profound disagreements about what Jesus meant. The early Church fathers held direct lineage with the disciples if the matter was settled with the disciples it would be settled with them.
It was only until the third century when Augustine won the argument that the Catholic Church proclaimed hell eternal. And there is no necessity to their arguments as to why they went with Augustine's take. You either agree with the text and leave it ambiguous or you agree with Augustine and the Catholic church and consider the matter settled.
If you go by the text itself there is no way to be clear for sure, if you trust the Catholic church and Augustine (which I do not by a country mile) then the matter is settled. But there is nothing necessary about Augustine's arguments.
Last edited: