- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 17,136
- Reaction score
- 2,905
You're totally missing jacks point.If you believe the title to be misleading, you're at odds with MSNBC's video title. It is neigh identical to theirs.
He still must be reeling.You're totally missing jacks point.
I am too.
If you believe the title to be misleading, you're at odds with MSNBC's video title. It is neigh identical to theirs.
You're totally missing jacks point.
I am too.
So MSNBC is not claiming that Putin is directly involved from sources including former intelligence officials and documents as reported by a parent company in NBC?Er, no. What's misleading is your presenting it as "MSNBC claims."
Seemed pretty simple to me, but I guess I have to consider the audience.
The dimwitted Podesta gave away his password in a phishing scam..
his password was " p@ssword" for crying out loud....
These MSM clowns are acting like it was some top level sophisticated hack...
all this took place before Trump was even a candidate .
So MSNBC is not claiming that Putin is directly involved from sources including former intelligence officials and documents as reported by a parent company in NBC?
Please, educate me.
Nothing in the title is misleading. MSNBC is reporting Putin is directly involved in US election hacking. I made no mention of their sources, as I said feel free to contact MSNBC for misleading titles on their own videos.Do you understand "misleading"? Doesn't mean "false."
Eggs Ackly.If they have evidence of it, they had better bloody well provide it. If there is confirmation of this, we should really know because it's important. I really hope this fits more the "exposing fact" paradigm than the "pushing narrative" one.
Nothing in the title is misleading. MSNBC is reporting Putin is directly involved in US election hacking. I made no mention of their sources, as I said feel free to contact MSNBC for misleading titles on their own videos.
The thread title isn't going to change. The wording is not perfect but I wanted to a accurately represent the title as MSNBC represented it. Contact them."MSNBC is reporting" is better than "MSNBC claims," but better still would be "sources tell NBC." "MSNBC claims" suggests that the source of the claim is MSNBC.
@IGIT has the background to weigh in on this.
Until the MSNBC viewers are able to verify the report based on source material, ts reporting that MSNBC is claiming the story to be true is correct."MSNBC is reporting" is better than "MSNBC claims," but better still would be "sources tell NBC." "MSNBC claims" suggests that the source of the claim is MSNBC.
@IGIT has the background to weigh in on this.
Until the MSNBC viewers are able to verify the report based on source material, ts reporting that MSNBC is claiming the story to be true is correct.
Unless you think they are proving verifiable proof in their report?