MSNBC ADMITTING They Plan To Suppress Voting Against Bernie!

second sight

We have officially entered the "Age of Deception"
@Silver
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
14,495
Reaction score
3,138
Looks like more collusion between most or all the mainstream media to give hillary a much needed push
What say you bernie voters...anyone care?

 
Bit of a reach here. He obviously meant that Hillary is so far ahead that it's a pretty much foregone conclusion she is going to win the primary . He said every news network - not just msnbc but every news outlet will proclaim her the winner. And if polling in NJ and Cali are any indication, he's right.
 
Democrats are hell bend on riding the Clinton boat, whether it's sinking or not
 
How is that suppressing? NJ polls close before California's. The rules of super delegates were known to Bernie before he started to run. He can't cry foul for democrats pledging their support to a democrat and not someone who puts an (I) in front of his name.
 
Gee whiz, I can't imagine why a right wing shill like second sight would be inventing stories to drive a wedge between hillary and bernie supporters.
 
I don't care what the stewart wanna be said, chris matthews said they already have election results for an election that won't happen until June 7.....and they plan on suppressing votes with that announcement.
 
Bit of a reach here. He obviously meant that Hillary is so far ahead that it's a pretty much foregone conclusion she is going to win the primary . He said every news network - not just msnbc but every news outlet will proclaim her the winner. And if polling in NJ and Cali are any indication, he's right.

I think the concern is that IF Hillary doesn't break the 2383 barrier b4 Cali, it could suppress the vote, which Matthews opined it might.
 
I think the concern is that IF Hillary doesn't break the 2383 barrier b4 Cali, it could suppress the vote, which Matthews opined it might.

I took it as after the polls close on the 7th - hillary will be deemed the winner. Not sure where you got your view from, I may have missed something in that clip.
 
I took it as after the polls close on the 7th - hillary will be deemed the winner. Not sure where you got your view from, I may have missed something in that clip.
They're going to announce it at 8pm EST, with 3 more hours left to vote in CA.
 
They're going to announce it at 8pm EST, with 3 more hours left to vote in CA.
Because New Jersey closes before that, and CLinton will more than likely have the votes needed.

Either way though, this video says nothing that the TS says it does.
 
Because New Jersey closes before that, and CLinton will more than likely have the votes needed.

Either way though, this video says nothing that the TS says it does.

I don't think people understand that NJ is voting the same day and had around 120 delegates and she's been leading in polls there for awhile. Those polls close at 8est.
 
Because New Jersey closes before that, and CLinton will more than likely have the votes needed.

Either way though, this video says nothing that the TS says it does.

Correct. If she reaches the delegate count then it's fair, if it's just speculation than it could be something else. The thread title is misleading but it's not an outright lie either. Matthews definitely hints at the announcement hurting turnout in CA.
 
I don't think people understand that NJ is voting the same day and had around 120 delegates and she's been leading in polls there for awhile. Those polls close at 8est.
No idea. People tend to ignore the 'smaller' state when a bigger fish is up for grabs.

But yeah, Jersey closes by 8est, which means it could all be over before Cali votes. Which is not unusual at all. But I bet dollars to cents that it will turn into a "conspiracy to hold Bernie down" if it happens.
 
They're going to announce it at 8pm EST, with 3 more hours left to vote in CA.

I didn't know his program didn't air natively at 8pm PST? Could've he meant that? 8pm seems like an odd to call it on the east for every network.
 
Correct. If she reaches the delegate count then it's fair, if it's just speculation than it could be something else. The thread title is misleading but it's not an outright lie either. Matthews definitely hints at the announcement hurting turnout in CA.
Of course it could hurt turnoout there. But the thread literally says "
MSNBC ADMITTING They Plan To Suppress Voting Against Bernie!"

Which is literally not true or said at all.

I just get tired of the incredibly misleading thread titles like this.
 
Of course it could hurt turnoout there. But the thread literally says "
MSNBC ADMITTING They Plan To Suppress Voting Against Bernie!"

Which is literally not true or said at all.

I just get tired of the incredibly misleading thread titles like this.

Thread title is click bait, it's our job to sift out the truth from the fiction
 
I didn't know his program didn't air natively at 8pm PST? Could've he meant that? 8pm seems like an odd to call it on the east for every network.

It wouldn't have to be his specific shitty show that made the announcement. MSNBC and its peers run 24/7.
It would be "breaking news" if they didn't all have a War Room programs going the whole time.
 
For a party deemed the "Democratic Party", it sure seems undemocratic the way their primary has played out. And now to top it off they intend to officially declare her the nominee before the largest state, in terms of GDP and population, has even finished voting.

How could any self-proclaimed Democrat be okay with this? The rules are pretty clear, and barring anything short of fantasy, the Democratic party will need super delegates to select their eventual nominee at the convention in July.

It's too bad Trump is completely full of shit and bent over for the established Republicans otherwise we could see both parties being exposed for how they make the presidential race a complete fucking joke. But I'll take 1 out of 2. Let's just hope Bernie doesn't puss out
 
Only crazy conspiracy theorist believe your garbage. The media is not controlled or in-cahoots man.
 
Back
Top