Mousasi has a way more diverse skill set. Losing to a fighter = / = being worse than them.
He has called for a rematch with HallTotally agree. Note that everyone Mousasi called out (Bisping, Vitor, Machida) is at least 6 years older than he is. I'm surprised he doesn't want a rematch with Hendo, too. Why not call out Jacare, Hall or Whittaker instead?
.
Let's just write off all of his good wins and then say he hasn't beat anybody. If we play that game with Machida then what? He beat Rashad and that's it. Jacare, OSP, Latifi, Hunt, Lombard, Manhoef vs. Tito, Rashad, a loss to Shogun that counted as a win, Bader, Dolloway? I'll take Gegard's wins.Is this based on anything other than your highly biased opinion? It's really hard to compare them. Machida has faced a murderer's row of top competition in his career. Mousasi has only fought a few elite fighters. It's even a stretch to call a smaller Lombard, early Jacare (when he was one-dimensional) or King Mo elite. Machida and the evolved UFC Jacare are probably the best guys he has fought. And how did that go for him?
I know how you feel dude, it hasn't been easy being a Machida fan recently with quite a few people shitting on him in his old age so I may have been a little sensitive. Props for being honest and to be honest i'd probably favour Gegard if they were to fight again based on their recent performances. All we have to make a judgement right now is the past, though.You know what, you're both right lol. I let my fandom blind me there for a minute and I gotta take a step back. I do personally think Gegard wins maybe 6/10 against Machida but Machida beat him soundly and deserves credit for that. So as it stands yeah Machida is better.
Let's just write off all of his good wins and then say he hasn't beat anybody. If we play that game with Machida then what? He beat Rashad and that's it. Jacare, OSP, Latifi, Hunt, Lombard, Manhoef vs. Tito, Rashad, a loss to Shogun that counted as a win, Bader, Dolloway? I'll take Gegard's wins.
edit: But again I was being biased, you're right. Machida beat Mousasi so that trumps anything Moose has done in a discussion on who is better.
How dumb what is? Playing these games? That's true that's why I said it was stupid to take away wins in the first place lol. I already said Machida beat Mousasi and thus it can't be argued that Moose is better in terms of career, etc. However, Moose and Machida fight who they fight and they look how they look in those fights. From the eye test, regardless of resume, I think Mousasi is a great fighter. Of course Machida is too. His resume is fine i was just proving my point about how you can attack wins and shred everything down to nothing if you want. I still like Moose's wins better than Machida's, but it's stupid to argue about that stuff. Moose finished Jacare tho. Doesn't matter what version of him that was, impressive stuff.So you take Machida's win over Shogun away but don't mention his questionable loss to Rampage or robbery against Phil Davis? Two guys who, at the time Machida fought them, would almost surely beat Mousasi? Machida beat a prime Rashad and is still the only guy to finish him. Thiago Silva was a good fighter when Lyoto beat him, and Machida is the first and only UFC fighter to finish him. If we're going to count welterweights like Lombard, then Machida also beat BJ Penn. And again, beating a green Jacare in 2008 is totally different than beating him today.
It's also funny how Bader isn't a worthwhile win, while OSP (whom Bader beat) is. And Latifi? Are you serious? As for Hunt, he was in the middle of a huge losing streak that also included Sean "Elite" McCorkle. Looked like he wasn't even training for MMA at that time.
Of course, you can play these games with anyone, but if you had a modicum of objectivity, you'd realize how dumb it is.
but why would he do that? he had a visible gut against Rockhold at least in some of the photos
Speaking of delusional.Mousasi is delusional and not even half the fighter Machida has been for his career.
frankly i could careless if they cut him.