Most blatant robbery decisions.

I am not disagreeing with you.
But During both fights, my perception was that the challenger beat the champion. And IMHO they only got the nod because of who they were, and not because they beat their opponent that night.

Look, if it helps, I find both champions to be better fighters than their challengers.
But in that night, both got beat.

Not disagreeing with you at all first time watching Jones-Gus, I thought Gus Edged him.
 
Silva vs Sonnen 1. He hit him 300 times and they declared him a winner. That's crazy to me.
 
Ross Pearson vs. Diego. Pearson dropped diego is the first round I belive twice and 2 judges gave the round to diego.

This. Lots if close decisions getting mentions in this thread. Diego-Pearson was not close.
 
TS is asking for the 'Most blatant robbery decisions', not 2 super close fights that could have gone either way, depending on how you were looking at it..

blatant.

BZQHqCFCcAAjugw.png:large
 
Tim Boetsch - CB Dollaway was fucking terrible but no one cared because it was CB who got screwed.

With most bad decisions, I disagree with the judges but at least can kind of envision their line of thinking. I have zero clue how two of the judges arrived at a scorecard that scored every round for Boetsch. There was literally no argument that could be made for Boetsch winning either of the first two rounds, and not much of one to be made for him winning the third.
 
Also nik lentz vs Tyson Griffin was ridiculous but falls outside of the usual suspects
 
Why has no one mentioned Matt Hamill using angles, pressure, cutting off Bisping & battering him in the U.K? The Judges awarded Michael Bisping the decision. The crowd knew he lost, but they were definitely satisfied with the decision.
 
Not disagreeing with you at all first time watching Jones-Gus, I thought Gus Edged him.

that's the thing.
Same for GSP.
and it was funny because both fights happened just after Silva lost.

IMHO this was "protecting" those champions :)
 
Why has no one mentioned Matt Hamill using angles, pressure, cutting off Bisping & battering him in the U.K? The Judges awarded Michael Bisping the decision. The crowd knew he lost, but they were definitely satisfied with the decision.

The irony here is that the one British judge scored it for Hamill, the two American judges scored it for Bisping.
 
In the UFC? Diego-Pearson by a fairly large margin
 
Back
Top