You gave a specific example of a strawman fallacy that happened to be an ad-hominem fallacy. Yet you want to brag about getting an A in logic yet lack the ability to utilize basic logic yourself.
Oh, what specific instance was that? I think I just pointed out that they are used in every thread. Relating everything to a different conspiracy theory that nobody is talking about, and then mocking the conspiracy is a strawman. That’s basically what I was talking about.
And then you worked in a gym where you got fired for sexually harassing customers.
It can also be a strawman.
Nothing like that happened. I won’t get into personal attack fallacy’s, because you simply don’t have the capacity to debate like an adult, and the “enlightened” brainwashed to be stupid party you worship doesn’t think you should now anyway.
No it can't. You didn't make up an argument to argue against, you attacked the person to avoid arguing against their position.
No dude. “Q” is the constant strawman you put any speech or action into so you can attack/dismiss. 120 high ranking military officials question the methods used during the last election? Oh ok, so they are just Q people, and that’s why their opinion doesn’t matter. Strawman.
Holy shit, dismissing someone's opinion based on a personal attack isn't a strawman. It's a personal attack, not an argumentative one.
If you distort what the person is actually saying, and then attack the thing you distorted it into, that is a strawman. It is very common for there to be multiple fallacies.. Especially from people who debate in bad faith from purely partisan perspectives.
Q ain't a position lol.... Stop showcasing your poor debating skills, homie. You've committed a ton of fallacies in your posts in this thread but aren't self-aware enough to realize it.
Sorry, but I’m not taking advice from a terrible poster who got shitcanned from a gym. They even took away your keys
