- Joined
- Mar 5, 2016
- Messages
- 7,310
- Reaction score
- 0
Same. They are one of the worst companies to go with and their customer service is awful. They don't give a shit
You still have to take out a BT subscription, its not like its free like some proclaim.
I dont think the point OP was making was that BT are a better company to work for, have better customer service, have better broadband coverage, better analysts etc.....
Purely that UFC will not be on pay-per-view for the foreseeable future and will continue to be "free" ( for Virgin customers, and only £10 a month for Sky customers)
Great news
that's exactly why I always record and start watching an hour into the eventGood but Sky would have given better exposure.
Now if only FOX realised the restoration of the world cannot stand the ad breaks every 5 minutes that would be great.
Seriously whenever it's on fox adverts between the rounds. Tone it the fuck down because breaking the momentum of a fight and doing that is how people will record it or download it and skip all of the ads.
America had a lot to learn about how to do good TV
..and also Sky or Virgin Media to get access to it. As someone who doesn't watch TV, I find it ridiculous.
You still have to take out a BT subscription, its not like its free like some proclaim.
Now if only FOX realised the restoration of the world cannot stand the ad breaks every 5 minutes that would be great.
Seriously whenever it's on fox adverts between the rounds. Tone it the fuck down because breaking the momentum of a fight and doing that is how people will record it or download it and skip all of the ads.
America had a lot to learn about how to do good TV
i agree. at least keep the cameras rolling between rounds and just scroll an advertisement at the bottom of the screen.
they keep the cameras rolling in the uk, we get the corners, just with no commentary
You still have to take out a BT subscription, its not like its free like some proclaim.
Good news for all fans...