Do you actually watch the Olympics? It ruins combat sports. One example: boxing. Most pro world champs don’t have a deep amateur pedigree. Why? What it takes to be a great amateur boxer doesn’t work in the pro ranks. Judo? Can’t even look at an opponent’s legs without getting a penalty. Taekwondo? Watered down to two guys bouncing on their toes, hands at their sides, waiting for a perfect opening for a kick that rarely comes.
MMA in the Olympics? No thanks
Without the olympics freestyle wrestling who is very important and greco who is also but less important would had never been developed well and would had been divided split into regional local traditional ruleset instead of an unified international rulesets. They wanted to remove wrestling from the olympics, thanks god they didn't.
Most MMA fighters dominant fighters champions have a wrestling background, that gave wrestling a good popularity. The new generation of bjj is thriving due to wrestling and leglocks but that is just a detail.
For boxing, yes and no. Trying to be an olympic champion before 22-26 and then moving pro is not a bad idea, in some countries having sponsored state program can give opportunities to fighter. But I understand the con, not being able to have one foot in each world and juggling between an amateur or pro career is a problem but cons and pros come together as a same coin.
About Judo, the problem with Judo is the new ruleset, they banned lower body attacks, low single, double legs, etc. The people who made these new rules who were disliked by the judokas themselves were not even athletes. They claimed that freestyle and greco wrestling are enough and that they wanted diversity to make the sport "better".
I can quote "Leg Grabs still exist as a part of the martial art of Judo, but as far as international competition they have been eliminated from play. Some techniques and strategies have been diminished as a result."
Old School Judo # Modern Judo
Takekwondo is not really interesting, I agree with that.
I think my friend leto, talking about the Olympics is a bit complex. I believe that it will make the sport of MMA more popular, and more athletes will invest in it to claim gold, it will create bigger audience. If governments sponsor directly a national MMA team, selecting people since their youth, like in China/Japan. This could benefit certain asian countries.
Olympics because of nationalism draw more crowd than any PPV, even a Khabib Connor fight will draw far less than an Olympic. So many nationatilites, so many athletes, so many supporters, if an athlete gets a medal he will be crowned and considered as a hero in his own home country.
"The IOC said
around five billion people followed Paris 2024, which is more than half of the world's population"
I doubt these numbers though, 5 billions, but even, just like 1 to 3 billions views is attractive. Ask me I don't care much about the olympics, some will say that sports are being directed by the elite to entertain the masses to distract them from real perspectives, but to me it's more just softpower.
If an athlete X let's say from Y country gets cold, he put his country on the map, he gives advertisement to his country indirectly, the more a country is know, the more it's economy is going to go up, mostly with tourism.
For example Khabib, made Dagestan famous. And thousands of tourists traveled there for at least a week to a whole one month, thus increasing the economy. This is a positive externality
With that national pride, according to some, it's another good effect, of bringing happiness to the common people.
I don't think that MMA amateurs for the olympics will be a bad idea, but it will all depend on the ruleset. Headgear on ? Headgear off ? No elbows allowed standing & grounded or just no elbow grounded ? 3x3 or 3x5 ? Scoring system ?
To be honest, I would just say that it has potential. Nothing more.
Do the olympics support Wrestling ? Absolutely. Wrestling is divided by so many locals wrestling traditionals wrestling styles, an international ruleset is key.
Do the olympics support Judo ? Yes, to a certain extent. But the new rules were not favorable, they undermined the quality of it.
Taekwondo is a joke somehow I won't count it.
And then you have Boxing. Does the olympics support Boxing ? A bit yes.
Boxing in trouble to be removed ?
I can quote "For many boxers, the Olympics serve as the ultimate career goal, a stepping stone to professional boxing, or even as a career in itself. Winning an Olympic medal, particularly a gold medal, can be a life-changing experience for athletes, providing them with sponsorship opportunities, endorsements, and international fame."
PRO Boxing is united, IBF, WBO, WBA,WBC, same rulset. MMA is not, PFL was no including eblows, now it does. One allows knee to a grounded opponents but allow often bouts in a ring instead of a cage.
An Olympic MMA will divide MMA more with different rulesets, that would be a bad effect, but popularity will be a good effect.