MMA judging; damaging shots vs. volume

[JJCc]

This won't happen, so damage can't be quantified in MMA judging.

Okay fine, the commission decides to change the rule, and make it that 1 hook = 3 jabs.

Quantified, they do so without any reason but just because they felt like, but it's still quantified. It isn't a opinion anymore, it's in the official rule, so you can't argue that 4 jabs don't beat a hook.

Again, you can quantify everything. Opinions only exist when things are vague. If the rule book decided to just throw a SPECIFIC definition behind damage, boom, instantly quantified.

 

[Emjay]

Okay fine, the commission decides to change the rule, and make it that 1 hook = 3 jabs.

Quantified, they do so without any reason but just because they felt like, but it's still quantified. It isn't a opinion anymore, it's in the official rule, so you can't argue that 4 jabs don't beat a hook.

Again, you can quantify everything. Opinions only exist when things are vague. If the rule book decided to just throw a definition behind damage, boom, instantly quantified.

Your science is trash. You haven't defined what "damage" is.

What you're doing amounts to counting how many times one thing lands versus another.

 

[Epicman1324]

Everything can be quantified.

Including your stupidity?