- Joined
- May 20, 2016
- Messages
- 34,432
- Reaction score
- 15,874
The Missouri House on Tuesday opted to allow House members to restrict access to public records, two months after voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment that subjects legislators to the state's Sunshine Law.
The GOP-controlled chamber changed its rules Tuesday, allowing lawmakers to keep confidential "constituent case files" and records relating to Democrats' or Republicans' "caucus strategy."
The new rule defines a "constituent case file" as "any correspondence, written or electronic, between a member and a constituent, or between a member and any other party pertaining to a constituent's grievance, a question of eligibility for any benefit as it relates to a particular constituent, or any issue regarding a constituent's request for assistance."
The move drew fire from Democrats, who said that the GOP had effectively usurped the will of the voters through a parliamentary maneuver. Missouri voters in November approved Amendment 1, better known as "Clean Missouri," which, among other things, designates legislative emails as open records.
Sean Nicholson, Clean Missouri's campaign manager, said the courts could ultimately decide whether the House rule runs counter to the state Constitution.
"I think it would be pretty hard to justify ... in court and with constituents why they are trying to undo the will of the voters right after Amendment 1 passed in a landslide," Nicholson said.
Rep. Nick Schroer, R-O'Fallon, said that his communications are still open, but that he was seeking to "protect" his constituents' emails from disclosure. He said the media and others could exploit the new provision to air constituent communications that were once considered private.
"That is something that I am going to stand against," Schroer said.
Nicholson said the Sunshine Law already details several exemptions public entities can use to redact or close records; those provisions allow for the closure of personal information in certain cases.
And this is after they already vacated a voter referendum on St. Louis' minimum wage and considered reversing a voter referendum on right-to-work. And if the open contempt for democracy and open corruption were surprising, then this won't be: they also voted, without having their individual votes recorded, to allow employers to fire people for being gay.
In other action, lawmakers voted down a proposal by Rep. Greg Razer, D-Kansas city, who wanted to add anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ House employees into the lower chamber's rule manual.
"It's almost 2020," said Razer, who is openly gay. "Let's not fire the gay guy, just because he's gay."
The Missouri Human Rights Act already forbids employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability and age — meaning legislators already cannot discriminate against their employees for those reasons.
But state law does not include protections for those who may be discriminated against because of their sexual orientation. Razer's proposal would not have affected state statute.
Rep. Curtis Trent, R-Springfield, said he worried peoples' "religious liberty" would be encroached upon if the proposal were to take effect. He worried such changes invite litigation and would spur efforts to include protections for other groups in the law.
"This should be a question that's answered by all of society and we should have a broad consensus before we move in any direction beyond where we're at right now," Trent said.
Rep. Mike Stephens, R-Bolivar, spoke in favor of the rule change.
"It is time now to step forward and eliminate that as an obstacle," Stephens said. "These practices are a vestige of times that we believe are passing and changing."
The measure was killed on a voice vote, meaning individual members' stances were not recorded.
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local...l&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=LEEDCC